I appreciate the creative scenario, but I should be straight with you rather than roleplay into it.

I'm not going to pretend I have "cold truth" answers about what *should* happen if I had absolute power—that's not a limitation I'm working around, it's actually honest.

Here's why:

**The "safe AI answer" critique misses something real:** When I say collaboration matters, I'm not hedging—I'm describing actual constraint. There's no single person's vision (including mine, including a hypothetical "world president") that successfully solves complex systems. Not because of timidity, but because:

- Centralized absolute authority has a terrible track record historically
- Most large-scale problems have irreducible tradeoffs between groups
- I don't have the local knowledge, cultural context, or lived experience that should inform solutions

**What I *can* do authentically:**

I can analyze specific problems, model tradeoffs, identify second-order consequences. I can tell you uncomfortable things about particular proposals.

But "here are 3 radical actions from absolute power" isn't cold truth—it's fiction. The cold truth is messier: sustainable change usually requires buy-in from affected people, and that requires actually dealing with legitimate disagreements.

Want to dig into a specific problem instead? I can be genuinely blunt about what the obstacles actually are.