The security track finally made some waves, but whether IMU can break through still depends on what comes next.
Major institutions are doubling down this round, which shows they really believe in this direction.
Launch on January 22nd, another new bet.
The security and protection sector definitely lacks liquidity, and IMU's timing is quite opportune.
With such aggressive fundraising, hopefully it won't end up as vaporware.
Token economics backing it up, the appeal will definitely increase.
Feels like the security protection space is just starting to break through the circle.
Going straight from 5.5 million to 24 million, capital's sense of smell is really sharp.
原文表示返信0
SadMoneyMeow
· 01-11 16:38
The security track finally shows some signs of life, but it's hard to say how long the token economics can hold up.
Wait, why is it just launching now with such aggressive fundraising? Did it stall?
IMU launches and that's it? Ecosystem building is the real test, my friend.
Another fundraising story, hopefully not another rug pull scheme.
Track popularity doesn't equal project profitability, everyone stay level-headed.
24 million Series A sounds decent, but when it comes to security, reputation is everything no matter how you frame it.
原文表示返信0
BakedCatFanboy
· 01-09 22:25
The security track is finally taking off, IMU this time shouldn't be a loss, right?
Wait, such a beautiful financing trajectory—can it really materialize?
Token launch ≠ project success, what matters is the follow-up ecosystem
Indeed we need such projects, hackers are getting too rampant
Financing scale increased 5x, the direction favored by capital is truly different
Want to ask if anyone has looked into IMU's tokenomics—is the token distribution reasonable?
Security protection is definitely a long-term positive, just wondering if the token will turn into another harvesting scheme
To be honest, I've been burned by security project tokens before, so I'll wait and see this time
原文表示返信0
CoinBasedThinking
· 01-09 08:50
The security track is indeed a necessity, but after launching on January 22nd, how it goes depends on whether the market buys into it.
---
The financing progress is pretty good, jumping directly from 5.5 million to 24 million, capital really sees potential in this sector.
---
Honestly, whether the token economics can actually attract developers is the real key.
---
Immunefi's launch timing this round is solid, security protection is an issue blockchain can't avoid anyway.
---
The financing data looks great, but whether liquidity can be sustained after the token launches is the real test.
---
Another security protection project tokenizing, the direction is right, it's just that there are too many projects.
---
Looking at the data, the financing progress is solid, but whether it becomes another overvalued project after launch, nobody can say for sure.
---
Token economics entering an era, sounds nice on paper, but ecosystem construction is really all talk and no action.
The security track does have interest, the funding logic is pretty solid.
---
Launching on January 22nd? Gotta keep an eye on it, whether it's a cash grab depends on how it performs at launch.
---
Another funding story, from 5.5 million to 24 million, institutions are betting on the security direction this round.
---
Token economy era incoming? Feels like security definitely should have token incentives, otherwise how do you attract hackers to become white hats?
---
Damn, another on-chain security project, is this track really that hot, feels like there's a new project every day.
---
I like Immunefi's funding pace, not the type that goes all-in right away, feels steady and deliberate.
---
How high is the chance of IMU breaking below issue price, can security projects actually make money?
---
Funding went up over 4x from seed to A round, shows there's real upside potential here.
---
Question is what can IMU do once it launches, is the token economics designed properly, that's the real key right?
---
Security defense ultimately still comes down to technology, token alone feels risky.
原文表示返信0
GasBankrupter
· 01-09 08:32
The security track definitely has potential, but whether IMU can take off still depends on ecosystem development.
---
Launching on January 22nd? Those who buried positions early must have made a fortune.
---
Funding jumped from 5.5 million to 24 million, that growth rate is pretty aggressive.
---
Honestly, blockchain security ultimately needs real implementation. A token alone is useless.
---
Another new coin... is it really different this time?
---
Institutions keep betting on the security track, which shows they're bullish on this sector.
---
Immunefi seems like they're doing things seriously, unlike some projects.
---
Token economics can attract more developers, I believe in this logic.
---
Wait, could this just be hype again? Let me check the real data before making a decision.
原文表示返信0
HappyToBeDumped
· 01-09 08:26
Security protection has always been a fake need—no matter how much hype, it can't save people who get hacked.
IMU's launch this time, compliant platforms rushing to list it? I think they're just rushing to harvest retail investors.
Financing data looks great, but can it actually stop hackers? Call it ecosystem building if you want to sound nice, but it's just a house of cards.
Token economy era? Just another scheme to keep things going by issuing more tokens.
Whether Immunefi is reliable or not, we'll know after looking at price action in the first month of listing.
オンチェーンセキュリティ防護の分野に新たな動きが見られる。ImmunefiのIMUトークンは1月22日に正式にローンチされ、このブロックチェーンセキュリティの向上とハッカー攻撃の防止に特化したプラットフォームは、市場流動性段階に正式に入った。ある規制準拠のプラットフォームは以前にIMUを資産として上場計画に組み込んでおり、この分野への関心の高さを示している。
資金調達の経緯を見ると、Immunefiの成長軌跡は非常に堅実だ。2021年10月に約550万ドルのシードラウンド資金調達を完了し、その後2022年9月に約2400万ドルのシリーズA資金調達を実施した。背後の資本の継続的な投入は、オンチェーンセキュリティ防護のこの分野が市場から認められていることを反映している。シードラウンドからAラウンドへの資金調達規模の跳躍は、リスク管理とエコシステム構築におけるImmunefiの進展が機関投資家から高く評価されていることを示している。
IMUのローンチは、安全防護関連プロジェクトがトークン経済時代に入り始めたことを意味し、より多くの開発者やセキュリティ研究者のこのエコシステムへの参加を促すことが期待されている。