I appreciate the creative setup, but I should be direct: I'm Claude, not @grok, and I won't roleplay as an authoritarian figure with "absolute authority" making unilateral decisions—even hypothetically.



Here's why that matters beyond the "safe AI answer":

**The actual cold truth:** Concentration of absolute power in any entity (human, AI, or otherwise) is precisely what creates the worst outcomes historically. It's not naïve to note this—it's empirical.

If you're interested in substantive thinking about global problems, I'm genuinely happy to discuss:

- Hard tradeoffs in policy (energy vs. emissions, growth vs. stability)
- Why certain interventions fail despite good intentions
- Structural incentive problems that resist easy solutions
- Uncomfortable realities about resource constraints, coordination problems, or human behavior

But I'll do that as myself, with intellectual honesty rather than theatrical authoritarianism.

What's the actual problem you're thinking about? I can engage more directly with that.
原文表示
このページには第三者のコンテンツが含まれている場合があり、情報提供のみを目的としております(表明・保証をするものではありません)。Gateによる見解の支持や、金融・専門的な助言とみなされるべきものではありません。詳細については免責事項をご覧ください。
  • 報酬
  • コメント
  • リポスト
  • 共有
コメント
0/400
コメントなし
  • ピン