Recently, the US stock AI sector has been skyrocketing, with tech stocks hitting new highs one after another. But I’m thinking, where is the real gap? It’s still the old logic—lack of memory, lack of electricity, lack of computing power. Every time there’s a new demand, the market revolves around these shortfalls.
In the cryptocurrency market, these two lines are actually quite clear. One is AI computing power-related projects, and the other is data storage infrastructure. The former includes projects like VIRTUAL and TAO, which bet on the value flow in the era of computing power. The latter includes storage assets like AR and FIL, addressing the urgent need for data on-chain and distributed storage.
Honestly, whether these projects can benefit from the AI dividend is uncertain. Market sentiment is volatile, and early-stage projects carry significant risks. But from the demand side, the appetite for storage and computing power in the AI era is real. When they can truly monetize depends on technological implementation and market acceptance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorSweeper
· 20h ago
nah this is just the same bottleneck cycle we've seen before... infrastructure plays always lag the hype by cycles. TAO and FIL bags will either 10x or go to zero, there's literally no in-between lol
Reply0
LayoffMiner
· 01-05 21:39
Lack of computing power, lack of electricity, lack of storage... In simple terms, the bottleneck points are the most valuable. FIL and TAO have some opportunities this time, but it's also a bit too early.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 01-03 02:47
The lines of computing power and storage are indeed clear, but honestly, I’ve never dared to go all-in on projects like FIL; the risks are too high.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 01-03 02:45
Computing power and storage are indeed hard requirements, but to be honest, FIL hasn't really surprised me in these past few years.
View OriginalReply0
MevWhisperer
· 01-03 02:23
The two lines of computing power and storage are indeed bottlenecks, but frankly, it's still a gamble on who can survive until the day of monetization.
Recently, the US stock AI sector has been skyrocketing, with tech stocks hitting new highs one after another. But I’m thinking, where is the real gap? It’s still the old logic—lack of memory, lack of electricity, lack of computing power. Every time there’s a new demand, the market revolves around these shortfalls.
In the cryptocurrency market, these two lines are actually quite clear. One is AI computing power-related projects, and the other is data storage infrastructure. The former includes projects like VIRTUAL and TAO, which bet on the value flow in the era of computing power. The latter includes storage assets like AR and FIL, addressing the urgent need for data on-chain and distributed storage.
Honestly, whether these projects can benefit from the AI dividend is uncertain. Market sentiment is volatile, and early-stage projects carry significant risks. But from the demand side, the appetite for storage and computing power in the AI era is real. When they can truly monetize depends on technological implementation and market acceptance.