Omimi

The reason bots win is because they don't get distracted by the noise.
As humans, we get lost in the fragmentation.
We see 5,000 pairs and try to find "the one."
I’ve started treating @MemeMax_Fi as a way to level that playing field.
It organizes the chaos into measurable focus zones.
It’s not about listing everything; it's about listing what matters.
When you change the way you see the market, you change the way you trade it.
The "noise" is just data that hasn't been filtered yet.
Fix the filter, fix the PnL.

the goal is a system where you don't have to believe what an operator tells you.
@confidentiallyr makes this happen by enforcing consensus through math and storing the proof on a decentralized ledger.
using collaborative ecdsa signatures means the network is self-policing at the code level.
it’s about making sure the truth is verifiable and the keys are never centralized.
is the industry finally moving toward "trustless by design" or are we still just playing pretend?

I was thinking about autonomous trading and robotics today.
If a bot makes an irreversible mistake with your capital, "the model hallucinated" isn't a good enough answer.
We’ve reached a point where intelligence without accountability is just a liability.
This is why I’m watching @inference_labs. They’re building the evidence layer. We need to stop shipping black boxes and start shipping math.
Thoughts on this?

privacy is the real bottleneck in web3, that’s what most people gloss over
put everything on-chain and you get transparency, sure, but you also leak data, break compliance, and scare off serious finance and enterprise users. that model doesn’t scale past experiments
this is where @0xMiden is playing a different game. execution happens off-chain, proofs go on-chain. the chain verifies that something is correct, not what the data is.
that’s how you keep information private without giving up trust
control never shifts to a middleman either. users hold custody by default, not by promise.
the sys