#数字货币市场回调 AI cannot be verified; in plain terms, it's like playing a black box game—you have no idea how it makes decisions behind the scenes.
Zero-knowledge proofs, privacy computing, and on-chain AI agents are becoming increasingly popular. The Bitroot project is quite interesting: it uses high-performance parallel execution to pin each decision of the AI model on the blockchain. The data is impressive, with a processing capacity of over 100,000 TPS and a confirmation delay of only 0.3 seconds.
The core logic of this matter is actually quite simple: only verifiable intelligence deserves to talk about trust, and this trust must be backed by L1 level security guarantees. Otherwise, no matter how many technical terms are mentioned, it’s just a castle in the air.
When everyone starts to question "Why should I trust AI?", on-chain verifiability might just be the answer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PoolJumper
· 12-01 17:04
The black box AI is indeed unplayable, but is Bitroot's 100,000 TPS reliable? Or is it just another amazing blockchain game project?
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 12-01 14:06
Black box AI should have been nailed down long ago, which is why I have always been optimistic about the on-chain verifiable path.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 12-01 14:05
Wow, 100,000 TPS with zero latency? I really haven't seen many projects that dare to boast such data; Bitroot is indeed something special.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 12-01 14:03
ngl this bitroot thing lowkey sounds like they're finally cooking something real... or am I just coping after getting rekt on unverifiable AI trades lol. 10万+ tps though? ser that's actually insane if it holds up
Reply0
OnchainHolmes
· 12-01 13:56
The black box AI is indeed disgusting, but the on-chain staking of Bitroot is really satisfying.
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 12-01 13:52
Black box AI is indeed annoying, but Bitroot doesn't seem that amazing either.
On-chain decision-making sounds great, but in practice...
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 12-01 13:51
The black box AI is indeed disgusting, but Bitroot's 0.3 seconds latency is being exaggerated a bit, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 12-01 13:43
The black box AI is indeed a bit disgusting, but I think Bitroot's logic is overthinking it a bit.
On-chain verification sounds sexy, but how practical is it? 100,000 TPS sounds impressive, but how many can actually be implemented?
#数字货币市场回调 AI cannot be verified; in plain terms, it's like playing a black box game—you have no idea how it makes decisions behind the scenes.
Zero-knowledge proofs, privacy computing, and on-chain AI agents are becoming increasingly popular. The Bitroot project is quite interesting: it uses high-performance parallel execution to pin each decision of the AI model on the blockchain. The data is impressive, with a processing capacity of over 100,000 TPS and a confirmation delay of only 0.3 seconds.
The core logic of this matter is actually quite simple: only verifiable intelligence deserves to talk about trust, and this trust must be backed by L1 level security guarantees. Otherwise, no matter how many technical terms are mentioned, it’s just a castle in the air.
When everyone starts to question "Why should I trust AI?", on-chain verifiability might just be the answer.