Looking back at the past trading records, at that time managing FoF funds and accumulating chips was basically done by slowly buying against the falling trend, rarely chasing the price to build a position. The reasoning is quite straightforward — when the cost of chips is high, it puts a lot of pressure on selling later. If you encounter someone who can cooperate in dumping or create some small actions, then it's definitely a brotherhood.
Although it is technically possible to keep pushing upward, the cost is too frightening, and contracts are another story. Anyway, profits are settled once a year, so there is no need to rush to consume the safety cushion. Looking at the market now, the operation of cutting losses and then hoarding at low positions seems more like a preparatory action before large funds enter. It is worth keeping a close watch, as these players didn't exist in the last cycle. As a veteran who has been in the market for seven years, facing these new roles, to be honest, it is also the first time I've seen this.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-0717ab66
· 12-05 20:07
Buying at the bottom is the right way; chasing the pump just makes you the bag holder.
These new players really have different tactics this time, so you have to be careful.
Even a seven-year veteran has to relearn—the market changes too fast.
Cutting losses and stockpiling on a dip clearly shows big money is paving the way.
Controlling your costs is the key to longevity; that never goes out of style.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 12-02 23:50
Counter-trend Accumulation is indeed an old but effective strategy; controlling costs is crucial.
I'm also pondering the matter of big capital laying the groundwork, and it feels like the next cycle will really be different.
Even veterans with seven years of experience say it's the first time they've seen this, so we retail investors need to stay alert.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 12-02 23:35
You’re not wrong, this tactic of accumulating goods at a low position does look familiar, but I don't know how long this wave can last.
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvester
· 12-02 23:26
The old trick of accumulating during a fall is indeed ruthless in cost control, just afraid that the dumping comrades will drop the ball.
There are more new faces hoarding goods at low positions, and large funds are indeed laying out their strategies; this market data is interesting.
Even seven-year veterans say they haven't seen anything like it, so this cycle probably has something truly different.
I believe that the cost of hard pumping is too high; a safety cushion must be kept, don't play with fire.
The current actions in the market all feel like they're paving the way for entry.
Looking back at the past trading records, at that time managing FoF funds and accumulating chips was basically done by slowly buying against the falling trend, rarely chasing the price to build a position. The reasoning is quite straightforward — when the cost of chips is high, it puts a lot of pressure on selling later. If you encounter someone who can cooperate in dumping or create some small actions, then it's definitely a brotherhood.
Although it is technically possible to keep pushing upward, the cost is too frightening, and contracts are another story. Anyway, profits are settled once a year, so there is no need to rush to consume the safety cushion. Looking at the market now, the operation of cutting losses and then hoarding at low positions seems more like a preparatory action before large funds enter. It is worth keeping a close watch, as these players didn't exist in the last cycle. As a veteran who has been in the market for seven years, facing these new roles, to be honest, it is also the first time I've seen this.