Bitcoin fell below $82,000, and Trump's nomination of Walsh caused market shocks

BTC0,05%
ETH-0,11%
BNB-0,01%
XRP-0,61%

According to news on January 30, the price of Bitcoin continued to fall during Thursday’s U.S. stock trading session, falling to a low of $81,000 at one point, and then rebounding to around $82,000. Bitcoin has fallen by nearly $10,000 in the past 24 hours, and the global cryptocurrency market is also under pressure, with Ethereum hovering around $2,700, BNB around $843, and XRP around $1.74.

CoinGlass data shows that more than $777 million in cryptocurrency long positions have been liquidated in the past hour, and the cumulative liquidation amount in 24 hours has reached $1.75 billion. This shows that the selling pressure in the market is still significant. Analysts point out that Bitcoin’s break below $85,000 could signal further downward pressure, with the November low currently held at $81,000 being a key support and potential support further down likely to be around $75,000.

The recent market decline is closely related to macro events. U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he would nominate former Federal Reserve member Kevin Wash to replace current Chairman Jerome Powell, raising high concerns about the market’s monetary policy prospects. Polymarket data shows that the probability of Walsh becoming Fed chairman soared to 87% in a short period of time, compared to only 37% previously. Prior to the announcement, BlackRock’s head of fixed income, Rick Riedel, had been considered more likely to be nominated and took a more dovish stance.

Market analysts believe that Walsh’s nomination may mean that monetary policy is becoming looser, which is both positive and uncertain for risk assets. Investor sentiment is intertwined between cryptocurrencies and traditional markets, leading to wild fluctuations in Bitcoin and major digital assets.

Overall, Bitcoin still faces downside risks in the short term, but there is still a chance to rebound above key support levels. Traders are closely monitoring U.S. policy movements and the impact of potential interest rate changes on the digital currency market, particularly the price fluctuations of Bitcoin and Ethereum.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

BTC rises 0.52% in 15 minutes: Major capital net inflows to exchanges and multiple market resonance driving the move

2026-03-20 21:15 to 21:30 (UTC), BTC recorded +0.52% return in 15 minutes, with a price range of 70124.0 to 70586.6 USDT, and amplitude of 0.66%. This round of volatility occurred against a backdrop of increased market attention and heightened fluctuations, with both on-chain and market participants showing highly active behavior. The main driver of this volatility was whale funds (entities holding >=1,000 BTC) making a net inflow of 4,091.39 BTC to exchanges within 24 hours, data significantly exceeding the average for the same period. Concentrated net inflows

GateNews11m ago

Bitcoin Has Stabilized, But Investors Are Paying Up for Downside Protection: VanEck

Bitcoin's volatility has decreased to around $70,000, but traders are still heavily investing in downside protection. Although premiums for puts have dropped, they remain high historically, suggesting caution among investors. This defensiveness may signal an impending price bottom, as similar market conditions in the past have led to recoveries.

Decrypt57m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments