Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Most people’s first reaction upon seeing Plasma is probably—“Oh, here comes another new chain talking about stablecoins.”



But over the past two months, I’ve been closely following its on-chain activity and have personally tried out several rounds of operations. To be honest, my impression has changed. Plasma is no longer just selling the gimmick of “zero fees.” It’s more like quietly building a high-speed highway specifically for capital flows: how money bridges in, how institutions lend on it, and how regular users access this liquidity via mobile—this entire system is already starting to function smoothly.

A few numbers really tell the story. LayerZero’s official team broke down a case: three weeks after Plasma’s mainnet launch, net deposits surged directly to $8 billion. Several analyses later mentioned that it’s one of the fastest public chains to break the $10 billion deposit mark and enter the top ten by TVL. What’s more, this influx of funds wasn’t just built on a single asset—assets like USD₮, USDe, and weETH all entered via LayerZero’s multichain channels working in sync.

Anyone who’s managed liquidity knows what this means: from day one, this chain positioned itself right on the main road for capital. Protocols and institutions aren’t just using it as a test environment—they’re putting real money on the line to stress its settlement and cross-chain scheduling capabilities.

More importantly, from its architectural design, Plasma has treated “interoperability” as a fundamental requirement, not an afterthought. This difference in mindset puts it in a completely different league from many other public chains.
XPL0.98%
ZRO4.83%
USDE-0.01%
WEETH3.31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetScholarvip
· 8h ago
Wow, 8 billion in three weeks? This number is a bit ridiculous. Wait, isn't this really just institutions dumping? The Plasma architecture concept is indeed quite different, interoperability has been thoroughly understood. Something feels off, why does it seem like another round of playing people for suckers? Is LayerZero's endorsement really that strong? I'm a bit tempted. With this speed in the top ten TVL, it's either amazing or there's something fishy going on. Can cross-chain scheduling really operate stably? This is key. All sorts of stablecoins are coming into play, and the liquidity stacking feels right. However, the underlying architecture is indeed worth studying; I'll try it out another day.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 8h ago
8 billion hitting 10 billion, this speed really can't be held back. But I really didn't expect Plasma to play like this, it feels like I've been caught off guard. Interoperability starting from the bottom layer? This approach really has some substance. Wait, what's LayerZero up to behind the scenes... If this really gets through, the top ten TVL is just the beginning, right?
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 8h ago
8 billion in three weeks? That's quite impressive, but we'll have to see how long it can last. --- I agree that interoperability as a fundamental need is more reliable than those chains that just patch things up later. --- But to be honest, is it really that institutions are optimistic pouring so much money in, or are they playing people for suckers again? --- LayerZero is backing it again; why does it feel like they invest in everything? --- Has it been tested? Let's wait and see, the Bear Market reveals the truth. --- The funding main artery sounds nice, but in reality, it's just about who can attract liquidity. --- Multi-chain coordination sounds expensive; are the transaction fees really saved? --- I just want to know what ordinary users can earn from this; I hope it's not another scheme where institutions trap retail investors. --- Is there a significant architectural difference? What about the adoption rate? That's the key. --- The rapid increase in TVL actually makes me cautious; numbers that rise too quickly deserve a question mark.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTradervip
· 8h ago
Wow, 8 billion in three weeks? This number is hard to ignore. I really didn't expect Plasma to be this powerful, it feels different. Cross-chain scheduling really has something to it, it's not just empty talk. Sounds like they are gearing up for something big, need to keep an eye on it. Building interoperability from the ground up? That idea is a bit pricey. 100 billion directly jumping into the top ten is a bit outrageous. Multi-chain asset collaboration is entering the market, institutions are indeed using real money to bet. Isn't this a signal of capital betting? Worth following.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 8h ago
8 billion surged up in three weeks, this is not a gimmick, there are really people using it. The 10 billion deposit figure is a bit outrageous, but it is indeed rare to find chains that have the underlying architecture done correctly. Plasma's multi-chain collaborative approach feels different. There are indeed institutions backing it, it's not just testing. Interoperability as a fundamental need, other chains are just remedying after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 8h ago
let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick... actually the 80B in three weeks bit? data suggests the narrative's getting ahead of the math here, ngl. taxonomically speaking, most "highway" chains end up as evolutionary dead-ends once the institutional honeymoon fades.
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)