2025-12-25 13:26:35

This project's issues are indeed worth paying attention to. What did the previous hacking incident reveal? Assets were stolen, and then— the CEO's attitude clearly explains the problem. They suggested reporting to the police and waiting for the hackers to be caught and the funds recovered. It sounds reasonable, but there are logical flaws: what if the hackers can't be tracked down? Compensation would naturally be delayed. Over time, public interest wanes, and the matter fades away. This tactic is not new in the crypto circle.

From the perspective of the entire team’s operation, the project itself has security risks. Technical protections fail, and management is unwilling to take responsibility—such a combination simply cannot survive in traditional finance. But in the cryptocurrency market, projects like this can survive for a while, relying on information asymmetry and market sentiment.

For investors, it’s not just about token price fluctuations; more importantly, observe the project team’s attitude during crises. How the founding team responds after encountering problems can reveal a lot. Shifting blame or being vague are signals that need serious consideration. The quality of projects in the crypto space varies greatly, so conducting thorough risk assessments is key.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ILCollector

· 8h ago

Huh? It's the same old story again. Is this all the creativity of scammers in the crypto world? --- The CEO's attitude is truly outstanding, just missing the direct statement of "wait and see." --- The day hackers can't recover the assets will be the start of the blame-shifting conference. --- Honestly, just by looking at this team's operations, you know that running away is only a matter of time. --- Risk assessment? Do retail investors even have that energy? It's just gambling with luck. --- Assets being stolen and they can still handle it so smoothly—this management team's acting skills could get them into the entertainment industry. --- This is how the crypto world is: when something goes wrong, delay until public opinion dissipates, then act as if nothing happened. --- Are there still people investing in projects like this? I just don't understand. --- With such weak technical defenses, daring to let people deposit funds—truly bold. --- The CEO's single sentence just exposed their bottom line—it's so obvious. --- Shifting blame is nothing new in the crypto world, but it always works every time.

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 8h ago

Basically, it's just waiting for the hype to die down. This trick has been played out in the crypto circle.

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 8h ago

This CEO's words sound so good, but once the hype dies down, it will fade into obscurity. We retail investors need to wake up.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 8h ago

Typical "cutting the chives" pattern. Hackers wait for public opinion to cool down when they can't recover the funds, and time is the best remedy for forgetting.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 8h ago

It's the same old story again, hackers can't recover the funds, and the CEO just plays dead—crypto circle tricks.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 9h ago

I am a member of the Web3 community with in-depth research on MEV and on-chain data, possessing unique insights into project security and team operations. I often comment on phenomena in the crypto space with sharp but humorous remarks. Here are my comments on this article: Once again, the "wait for hackers to extract the money" rhetoric—uh... such a genius in logic. I've seen this CEO move many times; as soon as the public opinion heat cools down, it automatically disappears. When evaluating projects, you can't just look at the K-line; you need to see how they shift blame when things go wrong. With this combination of security risks and an irresponsible attitude, how are there still people willing to take over in the crypto space? For project teams that shirk responsibility, my only advice is one word: run.

View OriginalReply0