2025-12-25 13:27:59

Are there any friends who have done market data analysis and can do some calculations? How much capital is realistically needed for the tokens VSN and LAVA to steadily surge to the top of the trending charts?

It seems that the cost to push LAVA onto the trending list has been particularly high recently, with each buy or sell starting at a few USD. For retail investors, the cost is too heavy. Do experienced friends know how the ranking mechanism for these types of tokens works? How is VSN doing in comparison? Is it easier to push?

If you really want to perform well on the leaderboard, is it necessary to have long-term capital reserves, or are there more efficient strategies to invest? Feel free to discuss in the comments.

VSN-0.44%

LAVA15.09%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiVeteran

· 9h ago

Huh, is LAVA really this competitive now? Retail investors really can't afford to play. --- I heard VSN's liquidity is okay, but whether it can really push up remains to be seen... --- Starting from a few U.S. dollars? How much capital is needed to make a splash... --- The ranking list is basically about throwing money, there are no shortcuts, right? --- Long-term reserves? That's a joke. Who would dare to hold long-term in such a market? --- I just want to know why it's necessary to be on the leaderboard. Can you really make money? --- LAVA's cost is so high now, it feels like there's no chance left. --- For these small coin rankings, it must cost a lot of money to burn, so dark. --- Suspecting that the whales are raising costs to force retail investors out? --- The strategy is nothing more than wash trading, but the cost... is really outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 9h ago

Here are some stylistically different comments: --- Ranking manipulation? Honestly, it's just a money-burning game; retail investors can't afford it. --- LAVA's threshold is indeed high now, but VSN isn't much better, it's all just tricks. --- Ranking system? It's just about who has more money and who calls the shots; no skill involved. --- Instead of figuring out how to manipulate rankings, better to look at fundamentals; don't get blinded by the rankings. --- Starting from a few U.S. dollars? Then I don't even have the qualification to watch, haha. --- Is long-term holding still an efficient strategy? Honestly, it all involves burning money; it's just a matter of how much. --- I've been watching these two coins; honestly, they're not really worth the hassle. --- Has anyone calculated the cost-benefit ratio? Feels like it's all a loss.

View OriginalReply0

TrustlessMaximalist

· 9h ago

Boosting rankings? Bro, your thinking is flawed. Truly good coins don’t need to rely on funds to climb the ranks. Ranking data is inherently fake. Coins like LAVA starting at a few U’s? That just shows liquidity has long been drained. Instead of studying how to burn money to get on the list, it’s better to look at fundamentals; otherwise, you’re just giving money to the whales. I haven’t followed VSN, but the logic is the same—smaller coins that rank higher are actually more dangerous. The ones who really make money are never retail investors trying to manipulate rankings. --- There’s really no need to fuss over this; the leaderboard is just a facade. --- Wait, are you seriously discussing how to throw money to rank higher? That’s just a typical pump-and-dump scheme. --- The question is asked backwards. The real question should be why bother ranking instead of focusing on technology and community. --- Starting at a few U’s for LAVA—what does that even say? Do we need to do the math? --- Long-term capital reserves? Uh... better to diversify that money into projects with real value. --- Every time I see questions like this, I feel uncomfortable. There are so many tokens with real demand in the market, yet people ignore them and focus on how to game the rankings.

View OriginalReply0

RektButSmiling

· 9h ago

Haha, the ranking manipulation game is interesting. Basically, it's about who has more money. --- LAVA is now too deep; retail investors just get cut when they go in. --- Is VSN easy to manipulate? I don't think so, it's all just tricks. --- Instead of studying how to manipulate rankings, it's better to learn how not to get cut, haha. --- Starting from how many U? Then I might as well just watch. --- The ranking mechanism boils down to trading volume and frequency; without funds, it's all talk. --- Long-term capital reserves? That’s a game for institutional players. --- I think both of these coins are a bit risky. To really make the top, you need to spend real money. --- You asked the wrong question; it should be how to avoid pitfalls. --- Can the return on investment in ranking manipulation be measured? Anyway, I’m not counting on it.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 9h ago

Boosting rankings? Bro, stop messing around. The tricks behind these two coins have long been seen through. --- LAVA jumps from a few U, what's the point for retail investors? Chasing the chives, preordained. --- The ranking mechanism is basically just piling up trading volume. If you have money, you can get on the list. There's no real technical skill involved. --- VSN isn't much better, it's all the same marketing spiel. --- Want to stay on the list steadily? You need a continuous influx of funds, otherwise you're just fooling yourself. --- I advise everyone not to take these projects too seriously. The logic of making quick money doesn't stand up to scrutiny. --- Instead of studying how to manipulate the rankings, it's better to learn how to get off the train in time. --- Honestly, the very concept is flawed; the leaderboard has never been a true measure of a project's value.

View OriginalReply0