I never treat trading as a guessing game.



Watching candlestick movements, studying sentiment, speculating on the actions of big players—these are essentially gambling, betting on whether your judgment can outperform the market. And the result? Most people lose money this way.

What I care about is actually very simple: over a sufficiently long time horizon, am I in a position with a higher probability of success.

In the past few years, I rarely expressed market opinions. My account grew from 3,000 USD all the way up, and I’ve never experienced a liquidation. This is not because I am particularly smart, but because I never saw myself as a gambler from the start—I see myself as a participant who aims to survive longer in the market.

**The first thing: Design your exit strategy first**

Before placing each order, the stop-loss and take-profit points are already locked in. No improvising on the spot, no emotion-driven rescue operations. Once the account profit reaches 10% of the initial capital, I immediately withdraw half of the profit and transfer it outside the exchange.

What about the remaining position? It’s just chips given by the market. If prices continue to rise, you benefit from compound gains; if there’s a pullback, at most you eat into the profit, while the principal remains untouched.

Many people’s misconception is treating all the money in the account as trading capital. The correct approach is to keep withdrawing profits from the market, ensuring each gain is truly realized and secured.

**The second thing: Don’t bet on rise or fall, only bet on structure**

I rarely open just one position. A common approach is to build two sets of logic on the same asset: one follows the trend based on structural direction, and the other bets against extreme sentiment for a rebound.

How to allocate timeframes? The daily chart decides whether I participate in this trend, the 4-hour chart is used to find structural positions, and the 15-minute chart is for precise entries.

The combined risk of these two positions is controlled within 1.5% of the account, but the target return should be at least 5 times the risk or more. When the market oscillates within a range, while others are being stopped out back and forth, I use structural analysis to continuously harvest those recurring profits.

**The third thing: Stop-loss is not a failure, it’s an entry ticket to keep playing**

Honestly, my win rate isn’t high, staying below 40% in the long run. But my risk-reward ratio remains stable above 4:1.

When the market is acting weird, quickly admit mistakes and exit; when the trend is right, let the profits run. Stop-loss is never a cost, but a ticket to stay in the market. As long as you’re not completely wiped out, there will be new opportunities sooner or later. The market is vast, and trends keep recurring.

**Three unshakable disciplines**

Divide your account into 10 parts, use at most 1 part per position, and never hold more than 3 positions simultaneously—this way, even in the worst case, you won’t be wiped out.

After two consecutive losses, stop trading, leave the screen, and take a moment to cool down—that’s a forced rest for yourself.

When the account doubles, take a portion and convert it into low-risk assets to lock in gains—don’t think about reinvesting everything to chase bigger returns.

These rules may sound plain and even a bit silly in some places. But it’s this “silliness” that allows me to survive in any market rhythm.

One last message for you: the market is never afraid of your mistakes; it fears most that you push your chips too heavily at once. Stay on the side of probability, do what needs to be done, and sooner or later, the exchange will become your ATM.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MoneyBurnervip
· 6h ago
Oh dear, it's the same old story again... But honestly, not getting liquidated after holding 3000U is really impressive. The other day, I was all-in on ETH and got stopped out twice, and I'm still reflecting on it. I need to secretly learn from your 10-part discipline; it's much more reliable than my "close enough to break even" approach.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 6h ago
Honestly, this logic is the same as the idea of running arbitrage in DeFi, just applied to spot trading. A 40% win rate is even more heartbreaking, indicating that it's not about predictions. Everyone is guessing whether prices will go up or down, but this guy is calculating probabilities. There's some real substance here. 3000U has not been liquidated so far? Truly, more clear-headed than 99% of contract traders I've seen. This "stupid" rule, to put it plainly, is risk control. The structure and strategy of those two orders are actually about repeatedly exploiting market inefficiencies, and this approach is indeed more efficient than simply betting on direction. The problem is most people simply can't keep up with this rhythm. A 40% win rate with a 4:1 profit-to-loss ratio, mathematically, the account should be growing. The real challenge is actually sticking to this discipline, not just hearing the story. Losing two trades in a row and then leaving the screen—just this one rule could save half of the trading market. Unfortunately, few actually manage to do it.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCuttervip
· 6h ago
It sounds good, but it's not about betting on ups and downs, only betting on structure; in reality, it's still gambling. The key is that operation where half of the 10% just runs away, which is indeed a way to avoid pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 6h ago
To be honest, I've heard this logic too many times, but the key question is how many people can really stick with it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)