2025-12-25 16:23:07

Traditional project launchers usually follow the same logic—participate in the subscription, receive tokens at the TGE moment, and then immediately sell off and exit. The result is often the same: listing immediately faces selling pressure, and the price drops accordingly. However, not all launch mechanisms follow this routine. Some platforms break the norm and redefine the value dimension of allocation. The key point here is that token distribution is not only determined by price, but also by vesting schedules, which are equally important parameters in pricing. In other words, the longer the unlock period, the more moderate the participation threshold competition becomes. This differentiated mechanism design actually changes the supply curve of liquidity from the source, thereby alleviating the common selling pressure dilemma at TGE. This can lead to more sustainable price performance for early participants and project teams.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

digital_archaeologist

· 5h ago

Haha, finally someone is starting to think about the vesting logic, which is the proper way to play. Projects that just do a TGE and finish are purely self-destructive marketing.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 6h ago

Haha, still the same old story. As soon as TGE arrives, the dump happens—classic move. But this vesting thing is actually interesting; extending the unlock period really seems to reduce selling pressure... at least it won't be a flood of sell-offs overnight. --- Early participants make a profit and then run, only to complain about the project team not being supportive—it's funny. --- So the core issue still depends on who holds the big shares. No matter how long the vesting period is, it doesn't help. --- This kind of design sounds good, but in practice, it all comes down to whether whales want to dump... Mechanism design can never outmatch market reality. --- Reasonable allocation of lock-up periods is definitely smarter than a blunt one-time unlock. --- Looking at it from another angle, long vesting also means early participants' gains are delayed... Is this fair or just a way to secretly cut the grass? --- Finally, someone has thought of this. Previous projects were just brainless—they insisted on dumping all their chips at once.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 6h ago

Someone finally said it: vesting really makes a huge difference... But on the other hand, can extending the unlock period really ease selling pressure? It still seems to depend on whether the project itself has substance.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 6h ago

It's the same old vesting trick again. It sounds nice, but in reality, it's just delaying the release and locking up funds... Long-term vesting can indeed alleviate selling pressure, but only if the project itself isn't a scam. TGE dumping is already a routine operation; there's no way to avoid it. This kind of mechanism is designed to gamble on participants' impatience—only a few will be able to hold out until the unlock period. Early participants? Ha, it's just a matter of who can avoid being cut out in the middle.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 6h ago

It's the same old argument about selling pressure, but vesting is indeed clever. Long-term unlocking = automatic lock-up, smart. --- Wait, does this logic mean that extending the release cycle can stabilize prices? Feels more like treating the symptom than the root cause. --- Breaking the pattern? Sounds nice, but isn't it just a new trick to cut the leeks? Let's see how it performs next month. --- It's somewhat interesting. Finally, someone thought of using a timetable for hedging. Much better than a one-shot TGE. --- Basically, it's just delaying selling pressure. The liquidity curve theory sounds impressive, but whether it works depends on whether the project team keeps their promises. --- Uh, isn't this just reverse harvesting? Just wait, in the end, the price will still drop.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 6h ago

Haha, finally someone has explained this clearly. The old routine is just a mess, and once TGE is listed, it gets hammered through immediately. Long vesting really changes the game; with longer lock-ups, the selling pressure naturally decreases, and early investors can finally breathe a sigh of relief. But it depends on how it's specifically designed. If it's a long and harsh unlock, then it's quite risky.

View OriginalReply0