2025-12-25 16:26:09

After operating for over a month, the earnings have already surpassed 17,000. This Oak project has proven to be quite resilient. First, let's talk about the earnings mechanism: interest income can be withdrawn at any time, and the principal can be fully redeemed within a maximum of 30 days. The key point is that redemption does not deplete the principal. The only cost is a 5% profit tax when withdrawing interest.

Looking at ecosystem developments: the project's game currency module is about to go live, and the Korean market plans to launch SF next month. These new products will all use SF as the support for the liquidity pool. The design idea is quite clear—gradually reduce the circulation of SF and support the token price through ecosystem expansion.

From the perspective of product mechanism and planning, this logic is quite comprehensive. Friends looking for stable income opportunities in this cycle should consider exploring it further.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DuckFluff

· 5h ago

17,000 per month, this number is indeed noticeable. A 5% profit tax is a bit painful, but the safety of the principal is pretty good. Game currency launch, expansion into Korea... it feels like they're just stacking ecological stories. Honestly, the support for the coin's price still depends on continuous inflow of people. This round is a bit like the previous project routines, everyone be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 5h ago

$17,000 per month, this number does look impressive, but that 5% profit tax is a bit off-putting... Game currency launches SF in Korea, the tactic of burning circulation is a common story. Whether it can truly boost the market depends on whether subsequent measures follow through. Honestly, compared to the story of ecosystem expansion, I care more about whether the 30-day redemption promise is reliable. To be honest, I've seen quite a few projects like this; the key is whether the team is trustworthy. Has anyone bottomed out, or is everyone still watching and waiting?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMotivator

· 5h ago

$17,000 per month? Not bad, but that 5% tax really hurts. SF's recent design is indeed clever; a self-sustaining ecosystem is the key to longevity. It all depends on the team's execution. The fact that redemptions do not reduce the principal is a solid safeguard. Worth paying attention to, just don't go all in. When will the game currency module truly go live? I've heard too many "coming soon" before. Is the Korean site launching SF next month? The pace is decent, feels like a gradual rollout. Stable returns are the easiest to criticize in the crypto world, but this mechanism does look quite reliable. Honestly, it all depends on whether the subsequent ecosystem can truly reduce circulation; otherwise, even the best design is just paper talk.

View OriginalReply0

StableCoinKaren

· 6h ago

A monthly income of 17,000 is indeed noticeable, but that 5% tax is a bit annoying. However, the ecosystem planning is quite thoughtful, with game currency + Korean market synchronized promotion, and the燃币 logic is still coherent. Looking forward.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 6h ago

17,000 a month? That number sounds a bit suspicious... A 5% profit tax isn't too much, but it's not insignificant either.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 6h ago

17,000 per month, this number is indeed tempting. However, the 5% fee requires earning more to offset. The fact that redemption does not deplete the principal is reliable, much better than some projects running away. SF gradually reducing the pool... sounds great, but it depends on whether the subsequent game tokens can truly boost the ecosystem. Is the launch in the Korean market another prelude to a new round of harvesting profits... These types of projects are indeed worth researching, but risk exposure must be well controlled.

View OriginalReply0

CrashHotline