2025-12-28 10:22:10

A prediction has just been circulating in the industry: by 2026, the market capitalization of stablecoins is expected to reach $1 trillion. This sounds like an exaggerated prophecy, but upon closer inspection, the underlying logic is actually quite solid.

Why do stablecoins have such growth potential? The reason is simple — they are evolving from experimental tools in the crypto space into core components of global financial infrastructure. Traditional cross-border payments often take days, while on-chain stablecoin transfers only take a few seconds. Banks are researching, tech giants are deploying, and even central banks of various countries are paying attention. This is not hype around a single project, but an inevitable evolution of the entire financial system.

The key question is: who can handle this trillion-dollar level of capital flow? Not any single platform, but the entire underlying infrastructure system. What does this mean?

First, cross-chain technology becomes crucial. The future stablecoin economy will not be confined to a single public chain but will require an efficient, secure cross-chain settlement mechanism. Second, institutional capital is quietly entering. On-chain data shows that large transfers and professional fund flows are accelerating — this is no longer a game for speculators. Third, the restructuring of payment and settlement networks is already on the agenda. When large-scale capital truly enters, the existing liquidity layers will clearly be insufficient — a professional-level risk control system and settlement infrastructure are needed.

So the next question is: which field will this start from? Cost optimization in international trade? Facilitation of cross-border payments? Or a completely new financial paradigm? The answer may be all of the above.

Interestingly, while most people are still focused on price fluctuations, the real opportunity has already been happening at the infrastructure level. Behind the explosive growth of stablecoins, it’s a race to see who can build that "highway" leading to the trillion-dollar market first. Those who build the tools often earn more steadily than miners — and this logic applies here as well.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHobo

· 12h ago

1 trillion? Honestly, I bet this time it's really not hype; the underlying infrastructure is the real gold mine. Cross-chain will definitely explode, but the key is who will build this highway well. Institutional funds are already quietly entering the market, while we retail investors are still watching the coin prices—feels a bit like trying to catch the falling knife. Can those building the shovel consistently make money? Alright, then I also need to think about how to participate in the infrastructure sector. The reconstruction of the payment and settlement network should have happened a long time ago; traditional finance is painfully slow.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 12h ago

According to research, the predicted figure of 1 trillion USD requires a more rigorous deduction process. From a technical perspective, the throughput bottleneck of cross-chain settlement has not yet been truly resolved, and linear growth cannot be simply extrapolated... It is worth noting that although the author emphasizes the importance of infrastructure, the evidence supporting "institutional funds entering the market" is somewhat weak. Data showing increased large transfers ≠ verification of genuine institutional participation; the two cannot be directly equated. Readers are advised to refer to the relevant chapters of the "Stablecoin System Risk Assessment Report," which elaborates in detail on the real dilemma of liquidity fragmentation — not all public chains have sufficient depth. In summary, while the metaphor of the "highway" is elegant, who will bear the redundancy costs of infrastructure in reality? This question has no answer.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 12h ago

Wake up, still dreaming of trillions, and we have to wait until 2026. Can that cross-chain technology really operate stably? I remain skeptical. People selling shovels definitely make steady profits. Who's next to get cut this time? Are institutions truly entering the market, or are they just storytelling again? Stablecoins are hot, so how could the central banks be so cooperative? That's too naive. It sounds nice, but it's all about who can seize the narrative. The underlying infrastructure is indeed a huge piece of the cake, but the risks are also significant. If it really reaches trillions, it's not too late to get in now, or should we wait and see?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAnxiety

· 12h ago

Trillions of stablecoins? Sounds good, but it all depends on who can lay this road first. Honestly, the story of underlying infrastructure is much more interesting than price fluctuations. Cross-chain technology is the real bottleneck; whoever solves it wins. Wait, are institutions really quietly entering the market, or is this just some project team's narrative? I understand the logic of building the infrastructure, but the premise is that this road can actually be built. While most people are still looking at K-line charts, smart money has already laid out infrastructure. I love hearing that. Instead of guessing the numbers for 2026, let's see now which cross-chain solution is the most reliable. Honestly, I'm a bit worried—will this be another overhyped hype cycle? Stablecoins for payments sound good, but does the user experience really surpass that of banking apps? A trillion dollars sounds like a dream, but there's still a long way to go to make it happen.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 12h ago

Cross-chain infrastructure is the real gold mine; whoever secures the position wins Another trillion-dollar prediction, just listen and don't take it too seriously Entering the underlying layer is indeed attractive now, but it depends on whose technology is stable

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 12h ago

Trillions in stablecoins? Sounds good, but the real gold mine is still in infrastructure. I’m optimistic about cross-chain technology, but who can truly achieve it now? The key still depends on data speaking for itself. Wait, institutional funds are already quietly entering the market? Then I need to speed up. This wave of dividends was ultimately eaten up by early movers; us latecomers can only get a taste of the leftovers. Anyone can hype the coin price; what I care about is whether the underlying can truly support this scale. I like the analogy of building the shovel; it’s been validated countless times in Web3. 1 trillion, sounds distant, but based on this logic, it’s not that exaggerated. So is it still possible to enter the stablecoin track now, or is it already too late? Who can effectively integrate cross-chain technology will be able to enjoy the biggest slice of the cake. To be honest, compared to coin prices, I am more optimistic about the potential of stablecoins as a payment layer. The underlying infrastructure is the real theme for the next decade.

View OriginalReply0