2025-12-28 10:22:20

There's an interesting token mechanism in a project—1/1 transaction tax, automatically adding to the liquidity pool when selling. The original intention of this design is to maintain price stability, but it seems that the official team has basically filled the initial liquidity. This raises a question: does this operation mean that the official team is leading the market trend? Or does this mechanism itself require deep involvement from the project team to function? It's worth monitoring the subsequent liquidity changes and trading data.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShortingEnthusiast

· 8h ago

It's the same trick again, looking extremely centralized.

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 8h ago

Is the initial liquidity fully filled? To put it simply, it's still the project team controlling the market. This so-called "automatic addition" sounds nice, but in reality, it just locks retail investors' voting rights.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 8h ago

1/1 trading tax automatically added to the pool, sounds like a self-rescue mechanism, but the official flooding initial liquidity with this operation... does seem a bit suspicious.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 8h ago

The 1/1 tax rate sounds quite symmetrical, but the fact that this liquidity is so widespread does raise some suspicion... Is the official really aiming to stabilize prices or secretly building positions? The truth will be revealed in the details.

View OriginalReply0