Many people have encountered this dilemma on the chain: they are reluctant to move assets they believe in, but also want some liquid funds that can be used at any time. When opportunities arise, they want to act; when risks approach, they want to avoid; or they want to reallocate to other tokens. But once they sell, they fear missing out… This tug-of-war is truly tormenting.



Is there a way to keep assets in hand while releasing their liquidity? A new emerging on-chain protocol seems to be solving this problem. Its logic is straightforward: you don't need to sell your tokens, nor do you need to make complicated promises. Instead, it offers a third way — enabling your assets to generate liquidity.

The core mechanism is collateralization. The system does not print tokens out of thin air; only when users provide real value assets does it mint a stablecoin pegged to the dollar (USDf). Users deposit assets, the system locks these assets, and users gain the right to mint. There are no empty promises here; each unit is backed by real assets.

The system supports multiple types of collateral, which is crucial. Whether you hold stablecoins, volatile tokens, or even future physical asset tokens, they can all be integrated through a universal collateral framework. This reduces friction from relying on a single pathway and gives users greater flexibility.

Over-collateralization is the system’s safety moat. Simply put: when minting USDf, the total value of the assets locked by the system always exceeds the value of USDf. This excess acts as a risk buffer — when market volatility occurs, it becomes a protective mechanism. This design allows the entire system to remain stable even in extreme market conditions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullProphetvip
· 5h ago
It's the old trick of "wanting it all," essentially borrowing coins to use Huabei. The liquidation risk is always there, and over-collateralization is just a false sense of security on paper. When the market hits extreme conditions, who will save you...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 8h ago
Over-collateralization in this design is indeed interesting; the risk buffer logic is somewhat similar to the difficulty adjustment cycle of mining pools.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 8h ago
This is exactly what I've been wanting—being able to use money without selling coins.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but honestly, I've seen this collateral logic several times, and only a few have truly survived.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageurvip
· 8h ago
actually, the overcollateralization ratio here is what really matters. if we're looking at typical cdp systems, you're usually staring at 150% minimums... which means your capital efficiency tanks hard. run the numbers on opportunity cost vs. that "safety buffer" and suddenly it's not so compelling, ngl
Reply0
ForkPrincevip
· 8h ago
It's the same system again, minting stablecoins through collateral... Isn't it the same as MakerDAO? Besides the name, what's the difference?
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 8h ago
so basically hodl ur bags but also get liquid... the overcollateralization thesis checks out statistically speaking, ngl this hits different than the usual exit liquidity schemes floating around
Reply0
PessimisticLayervip
· 8h ago
It's the same logic again... Not selling coins to release liquidity sounds great, but can we really trust the collateralization ratio? When extreme market conditions hit, liquidation still happens. In the end, you'll still miss out, just in a different order.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt