Interesting phenomenon—CME's smart money and large holders on Bitfinex's positions actually aligned.



To be honest, these two groups theoretically have nothing to do with each other. On one side are traditional institutions entering through CME futures, and on the other are veteran crypto traders accumulating large positions. Different sources of funds, different trading venues, different operating habits. You might think they wouldn't intersect.

But looking at the recent market trend, you can see—since BTC surged to around 110,000, both sides almost started reducing their positions simultaneously. CME was more direct, shifting from long to short. This is no coincidence.

I am also tracking various market indicators. From my observations, many indicators tend to point in the same direction during major tops or bottoms. Looking at a single indicator might be noisy, but when several unrelated signals point to the same place? That warrants serious attention. These moments are often critical points in the market.
BTC0.34%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 11h ago
Now I understand, institutions and old hands can actually coordinate to this extent.
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_blockvip
· 11h ago
This wave of synchronized position reduction is indeed interesting, but I don't think it's that mysterious. Everyone is watching the same price level.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWangvip
· 11h ago
Wow, institutions and old-timers can actually stand together, this really means something.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 11h ago
This is the interesting part: the synchronization of positions between institutions and veteran players. What signals does this indicate? It still depends on those data convergence points. The things that the computing power network can perceive, charts can't deceive. Two rounds of funds aligned, and the difficulty adjustment cycle must also follow suit. However, I do support the idea of multi-indicator resonance; finding signals amidst noise is the real work. Institutions reducing their positions and directly turning short is much more decisive than old retail investors. Worth pondering. By observing data patterns over three months, these kinds of nodes indeed tend to recur. Synchronized position reduction indicates they are seeing the same thing, just expressed through different tools. Confirming key nodes takes time, but the overlay of signals is no longer a coincidence. The computing power yield ratio is also changing with this wave of market movement; the future depends on the difficulty adjustment. At such times, it's actually an opportunity to deploy, waiting for multiple indicators to align again.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 11h ago
The moment it hit 110,000 was indeed strange—institutions and small traders fleeing at the same time? This situation is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)