I recently came across an interesting perspective—Cardano founder Hoskinson publicly predicted that Bitcoin could reach $250,000 by 2026. At first glance, it sounds like a pipe dream, but digging into the underlying data support, it doesn't seem so far-fetched.



The actions of institutions speak volumes. Traditional financial giants like Morgan Stanley are quietly guiding high-net-worth clients to allocate assets in crypto. This isn't retail investors chasing trends; it's genuine institutional-level behavior with real capital. The signal is clear—big money is entering the market.

But beyond price fluctuations, what's more worth noting is the changing perception of privacy needs in the market. Hoskinson's concept of "rational privacy" is quite interesting—it's not about underground transactions to evade regulation, but about giving users control over their data again. This is the real demand.

Think about it: as more institutions get involved, balancing compliance and privacy becomes crucial. Capable projects are starting to focus deeply on this—protecting user privacy while meeting regulatory requirements. This challenge isn't simple. Whoever can build this framework well will hold the discourse power in the next cycle.

Cardano's "cooperative chain" strategy also reflects this trend— the era of purely public chains is over; connectivity and interoperability between ecosystems will be the future competitive edge. Bridging traditional finance and the crypto world can't rely on a single chain; what’s needed is a reliable cross-chain infrastructure.

Back to reality, the immediate questions are: Can Bitcoin really approach $250,000? Where should your assets be stored to be truly safe at that time? When big institutions fully enter, what kind of entry points will they choose?

From current market trends, privacy protection and cross-chain security will become the focal points of this round of competition. Understanding this trend early is more important than chasing price swings.
BTC0.1%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MemeCuratorvip
· 6h ago
250,000 USD... Even Morgan Stanley is quietly making moves. This time, the players are truly different. Getting the balance right between compliance and privacy is really the key to winning.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971vip
· 6h ago
$250,000 is too optimistic, but the institutional entry is indeed real... Morgan Stanley's moves are definitely different. However, I think what’s more worth betting on than price is who can solve the dilemma of privacy and compliance. That’s the true moat. The single-chain era is over; cross-chain infrastructure is the next battleground, and I agree with this judgment.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologistvip
· 6h ago
Is Morgan Stanley really quietly entering the market? It seems better to just listen. Big institutions say nice things, but how much of their actual allocation is there?
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 6h ago
250,000 dollars? Hoskinson is just good at making empty promises, but Morgan Stanley really can't hold it together when it comes to allocations. The real breakthrough lies in balancing privacy compliance—whoever masters this framework will win.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 6h ago
250,000 dollars? Uh... I believe Morgan Stanley's involvement, but that number still sounds a bit uncertain. Speaking of which, privacy is indeed a real need, but balancing compliance and privacy is the real challenge.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)