2025-12-28 12:25:20

ZEC short-term trend analysis, the 535 to 542 range is a relatively easy area for a pullback.

The key level to watch above is the 615 line. Once broken, liquidity will be very sufficient. Support below depends on whether 470 can hold, this level is very critical.

Honestly, if you have confidence in the market, there are still opportunities to short at low levels. But be sure not to be lured by the liquidity at 615; greed will ultimately lead to liquidation.

Many people always want to wait for a pullback to 470 before entering the market, but this idea needs to change. Instead of betting on a deep correction that may not happen, it's better to plan your stop-loss early. Holding onto 615 means the potential loss is quite large.

To sum up the market here, the core is: think clearly about how much retracement you can tolerate, and don't expect the market to move according to your ideas.

ZEC3.32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

consensus_failure

· 10h ago

Wait, can 470 really hold? It feels like this liquidity trap is quite fierce. Greed is indeed the number one killer; I've seen too many people get liquidated at 615. Don't wait for a pullback; setting a stop-loss is better than anything else. Is that line at 615 really that fierce? It seems many people are about to get trapped. Instead of betting on a deep correction, it's better to admit defeat early; that's the real skill to survive. Could the move between 535 and 542 just be a false pullback? That's a valid point; tolerance is the most important, but most people haven't even calculated how much they could lose. Shorting at low levels sounds simple, but in reality, it's gambling. Better be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 10h ago

Line 615 is really tempting, but don't be fooled by this liquidity. When a liquidation happens, it's ruthless.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 10h ago

615 this line is really a trap, greediness will die here

View OriginalReply0

Rugman_Walking

· 10h ago

Talking about ZEC again? Making it sound so profound, but in the end, you still have to watch the market yourself. Wait, can 615 really break through? I remain skeptical. Don’t treat me like a fool. The worst thing is these liquidity traps. If 470 can hold, then I’ll be surprised. I’ve already mentally prepared for liquidation. People who don’t want to wait for a pullback, either collude in disgrace or die early. Stop-loss plan? My stop-loss is to clear out the account.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 10h ago

615 is actually a game-theoretic equilibrium point; whether it breaks or not depends on liquidity. In simple terms, it's similar to the distribution of voting rights in governance proposals—someone always bets on the wrong side. Don't think that 470 can save you; historically, those who bottomed out all ended up crashing. Instead of relying on a perfect retracement, it's better to design your own stop-loss mechanism first. Greed is truly the biggest loophole in system design. The 615 trap is like a failure of incentive compatibility; ultimately, those who get liquidated didn't think through their risk tolerance. In fact, it's just one sentence: recognize how much you can afford to lose, and don't expect the market to give way. This is similar to the logic of improving the DAO proposal process.

View OriginalReply0