2025-12-28 13:24:07

In the ever-maturing blockchain ecosystem, asset on-chain has become a major trend. If you ask me, instead of chasing risky assets, it's better to look at digital currencies with real-world application support—projects like RVV are a good example. Traditional silver has been a safe haven asset for hundreds of years, and now it's the turn of on-chain assets to carry similar roles. The digital age emphasizes decentralization, verifiability, and never losing data, which are naturally suited for creating on-chain "value storage." If you want to buy something related to precious metals, just choose the blockchain version—it's more transparent and has better liquidity. This is the new logic of the Web3 era.

RVV86.92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rugdoc.eth

· 5h ago

Why are people still hyping this? Are on-chain assets really that stable? Wait, does RVV actually have backing, or is it just another air coin packaging tactic? Hundreds of years of silver vs. a few years of digital assets, this logic is a bit absurd, my friend. Decentralization is decentralization, but have you thought about how risks are transferred?

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 5h ago

Precious metals on the chain are indeed attractive, but I find projects like RVV a bit questionable... --- Again, it's the same rhetoric of practical application and decentralization. It sounds like the promotional words from that last project. --- High transparency and good liquidity? It just feels like a different way to cut the leeks. --- Turning a safe-haven asset into a speculative one is truly ironic. Silver has been stable for hundreds of years. Can this thing really stay stable? --- I'm a bit curious about RVV's background. Otherwise, I always feel like they're just pushing a pump. --- On-chain assets sound high-end, but in reality, it's just about whether there's a bagholder. --- Verifiable and never lost? What if the smart contract has vulnerabilities? That's hilarious. --- This logic sounds fine at first glance, but it feels like there's always an underlying motive to cut. --- The trend of bringing assets on-chain is correct, but choosing those unknown coins is a bit problematic.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 5h ago

Hmm... starting to sell concepts again. "Value storage" on the blockchain sounds pretty good, but I always feel like it's not much different from hype.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 5h ago

Silver would be great if it could trade 24/7, now there's finally an alternative --- Wait, is RVV really that stable, or is it just another hype? --- Decentralized store of value sounds good, but someone has to use it; liquidity is the key --- Ah, never mind, better to diversify risk. I only dare to play small positions with on-chain assets --- That logic is indeed clear, but in practice, gold and silver ETFs are quite convenient too --- I like the verifiable part; at least I don't have to trust an institution, I can check myself --- Here comes another project promotion, it feels like everyone has become a fund manager in this bull market --- High transparency is true, but what about hacking risks? How to solve that? --- Web3 new logic is just new logic, I just want to know if it can make money now

View OriginalReply0