🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Looking at this data comparison, the true strength gap among exchanges is clear at a glance.
A leading exchange has a reserve scale of 165974M, far ahead of the entire field. How exaggerated is this number? To put it another way, its fund pool size is nearly 10 times that of the second-ranked OKX (17532M). In terms of fund security and risk resistance, the gap is right here.
Interestingly, the subsequent group shows a clear echelon effect. Exchanges like OKX, Bitget, and Bybit have reserve amounts concentrated between 5917M and 17532M, each competing within the same level. Although their scale is not as large as the top players, they have also established their own competitive moats.
For users, the essence reflected by this data is: when choosing an exchange, reserve scale is indeed a key indicator. The thicker the reserves, the stronger the platform’s buffer capacity to handle black swan events. From this perspective, liquidity and safety coefficients have quantifiable references.