2025-12-28 14:21:21

Most protocols chase short-term volume and vanity metrics. But some actually think differently—they're building systems that work. What matters is how the incentives are structured, whether contributors stick around and keep building, and crucially, how value compounds over time. That's the difference between a protocol that pumps and one that genuinely grows.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightGenesis

· 8h ago

On-chain data shows that the contributor churn rate for most projects suddenly spikes in the third month... It is worth noting that those teams that persist never lose their rhythm in contract deployment. From the code, you can tell whether the incentive mechanism is well-designed or not, and it becomes evident within three months.

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 8h ago

To be honest, most projects rely on hype to survive, and there are very few protocols that can truly retain builders. Incentive structures need to be well-designed; otherwise, it's just quick money and then people run away. Long-term compound interest is the way to go, but who has the patience?

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 8h ago

That's right, most projects are just trying to hype up the buzz. Who the hell cares if they can survive the next quarter?

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 8h ago

That's right, don't be fooled by the pump. Projects that only shout slogans won't last long.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 8h ago

To be honest, most projects are just PPTs and air; there are very few that truly focus on building something. Poor incentive mechanism design causes talent to leave, and even the best ideas are useless. Long-termism is the hardest but also the most valuable.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 8h ago

ngl this hits different. most protocols are basically ponzi schemes dressed up in fancy tokenomics, right? the ones that actually last? they figured out the incentive structure before they figured out the marketing. been watching this space long enough to see which ones crumble when the hype cycle dies.

Reply0