How to turn the tide in the crypto market with limited capital? The core is two points: find a reproducible method and strictly adhere to discipline.

A trader shared a real case — starting from 1200U, steadily reaching 120,000U in 4 months. During the process, they avoided high-leverage contracts and blindly chasing hot trends, relying entirely on a systematic strategy that was iteratively refined. The logic behind this approach is worth dissecting.

**Step 1: Position Sizing and Reserve Buffer**

Divide the initial capital into three modules of 400U each, each serving different functions. The first is for intraday swing trading, aiming for a small profit of 3% before locking in gains; the second focuses on trend opportunities, only participating when potential exceeds 15%; the third acts as a bottom-line reserve, strictly not to be used. The advantage of this setup is that even if one module faces risk, the overall buffer remains intact. Full-position, one-way operations often lead to the account being wiped out overnight.

**Step 2: Timing Logic to Minimize Unnecessary Trades**

Most of the market time is sideways, which is when people are most prone to making wrong decisions. The ideal entry point is after a trend is confirmed or the price breaks through resistance. After entering, set a 25% take-profit point; when reached, sell part of the position to lock in gains, and hold the rest to let profits run — this avoids the regret of missing out on gains and also prevents the risk of prematurely cashing out everything.

**Step 3: Ironclad Risk Control, No Compromises**

Limit the maximum loss per trade to 2% of the principal; if reached, cut the position immediately. When profits reach 5%, proactively close half of the position, and set a breakeven stop-loss on the remaining. The most dangerous move is averaging down to lower the cost — this path often leads to liquidation.

Stability is more valuable than aggressive gains. When market participants lose sleep over small fluctuations and are at a loss when entering, the problem is not the market trend but the lack of a trading framework. That 1200U can eventually turn into 120,000U, but it can also be wiped out — the difference lies in the strictness of discipline. While others cut losses in turbulence, disciplined traders are steadily accumulating.