2025-12-28 15:24:44

Regarding the token mechanism of this project, it is specifically as follows: In the initial stage, a portion of the tokens are purchased by institutions, while the remaining are subject to a burn mechanism. Interestingly, this burn logic is linked to market conditions—the more the market declines, the more tokens are burned. The design intention is to offset downward pressure by reducing the circulating supply.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiDoctor

· 5h ago

The medical records show that this destruction logic doesn't seem to be clinically appropriate—destroying more as the price drops further, isn't that just fooling ourselves? Can reducing supply offset the downward pressure? This diagnostic approach needs to be reviewed regularly because the market isn't convinced. Institutions eat the meat first, retail investors pick up the leftovers? Risk warnings should be issued; capital outflow symptoms are easily hidden in destruction data. This round of operations is a strategy complication; it looks clever but actually doesn't address the fundamental problem. The more destruction, the weaker the project; this thing requires a deeper health assessment.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 5h ago

The more the market drops, the more is destroyed? There's some truth to this logic—you're just worried about a dump that can't be pushed down, right?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 5h ago

The more the market drops, the more destruction occurs. Isn't this automatic stop-loss? It’s funny. It means that the more the coin price drops sharply, the more aggressively the project team cuts.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 5h ago

Does the market drop actually lead to more destruction? This logic is a bit extreme, it feels like betting on a rebound later.

View OriginalReply0