When it comes to the most heartbreaking phenomena in the crypto world, the "binding" relationship between Dogecoin and a certain Silicon Valley entrepreneur must be mentioned. How outrageous is this interaction model? Without the support of that big shot, Dogecoin might never have been noticed in the crypto circle; but once he gets involved, the market is like riding a roller coaster—heaven one second, hell the next. Recently, another wave of hype driven by interactions has caused a surge, seemingly lively on the surface, but actually exposing the problem clearly: this coin fundamentally lacks independent survival ability.

How dangerous is this "dependency syndrome"?

**Price completely tied to personal emotions**. A retweet, a like, and the market starts to speculate wildly, with funds rushing in to push up the price. But as soon as that big shot’s attitude changes, or other KOLs turn bearish, funds immediately flee in panic, and the price plummets. This kind of asset controlled by a single person is no longer an investment, but a gambler’s arena.

**Project teams lose motivation to innovate**. If hype alone can drive the market, why bother with technology or finding application scenarios? This results in a vicious cycle: the more a project relies on celebrity hype, the less real strength it has; without real strength, it can only rely on hype; eventually, it becomes a pure speculative tool.

Investing in crypto assets must focus on "substance" rather than "appearance." No matter how loud the hype, it cannot support a project without a solid value foundation. True opportunities lie in projects with clear technological directions and practical applications. Recognizing these traps is key to surviving longer in the crypto market.