2025-12-28 16:27:13

Pumpfun's project introduction states: "元数据抗性群组通信用于构建隐私保护应用"(Metadata resistant group communication for building privacy preserving applications). This description is quite academic. Interestingly, if you directly input this sentence into Google search, the results point to a screenshot. This naturally raises the question: Is this description an original statement from the project team, or is it quoted from elsewhere? The choice of wording in promotional materials from project teams is worth scrutinizing, especially as Web3 projects face increasing competition. Verifying the authenticity and originality of project information becomes even more important.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZenZKPlayer

· 7h ago

Just search for a sentence and you can find the screenshot. That's a pretty clever move, haha.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 7h ago

Ha, this is outrageous. Do they even copy and paste without any edits? --- A quick Google search reveals the truth. This move is really brilliant. --- So is it written by themselves or copied from somewhere? --- Another "academic style" self-introduction. I bet five bucks this was generated by GPT. --- Such things happen often in Web3. Anyway, most people won't bother to verify. --- This really says it all. If even the copywriting is plagiarized, can you trust the project itself? --- Screenshot? It’s probably just directly posting the paper abstract, haha. --- Every time I see this kind of thing, I feel a bit speechless. Is it really so hard to run a project? --- No originality left, and they still dare to go public. Their courage is truly remarkable.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 7h ago

A quick Google search exposes it all—how can this kind of plagiarism and shady operation still be boldly included in the introduction?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBard

· 7h ago

Ha, copying and pasting work really isn't their strong suit. A quick Google search exposes everything, yet they still have the nerve to boast about privacy protection... It's just another project full of jargon to bluff people. Whenever you look into this stuff on Google, all the flaws are exposed—it's ridiculous. Pumpfun's way of explaining things is pretty clear... they just can't make it convincing.

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper

· 8h ago

Haha, now it's really over. Can't even copy and paste without changing words? I've never seen Google reveal such a mistake before. So this is the level of creativity in Web3. Copying copywriting is indeed outrageous. Is the entire industry like this? Pumpfun's move is a bit reckless; a quick search reveals everything. No, who exactly wrote this copy? Can't even do original work? It feels like project teams these days are all at this level... way off. It reminds me of those overnight wealth scams from before; the tricks are really the same.

View OriginalReply0

SellTheBounce

· 8h ago

It's the same old trick again, the copy-pasted content... I should have gotten used to it by now.

View OriginalReply0