The deflationary craze is sweeping the crypto world, but different projects have vastly different approaches. ASTER and UNI are like two extreme examples—one building an ecosystem from scratch, the other reintroducing protocol dividends into governance tokens.

**ASTER's Approach: Ecosystem First**
Simply put, it's a two-pronged strategy. One side uses actual revenue to implement a burn plan for true deflation, while the other collaborates with Japanese financial institution SBI to promote compliant stablecoins. The idea is clear: create a closed-loop financial ecosystem, making circulating tokens increasingly scarce, and allowing the ecosystem's value to rise accordingly.

**UNI's Logic: Revenue Burn**
As the world's largest DEX, Uniswap is already an industry giant, and it has activated its fee mechanism. The massive annual fee income is directly used to burn UNI, effectively turning the protocol's cash flow into token value. The governance token has shifted from a simple voting credential to a genuinely cash-flow-backed asset.

The fundamental difference between these two approaches is obvious: one is building a new ecosystem to give tokens value, while the other is directly transferring mature protocol revenues to the governance layer.

Which model do you believe in more?