There's something worth examining here. When builders talk about projects like Irys, iDos, Allora, Boost, Monad, Everlyn, Hey Elsa, Covalent, and Project Merlin—are they making calculated bets or just riding hype? The "yap to earn" mentality has infiltrated crypto discourse more than we'd like to admit. What separates genuine conviction from noise? If you've genuinely tracked these projects, understood their mechanics, analyzed their tokenomics—that's different from casual shilling. But let's be real: how many actually did the work? The ones who committed serious attention to these ecosystems are playing a different game than those just listing names. The real question isn't whether supporting multiple projects is lazy—it's whether you understand what you're actually backing.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatchervip
· 5h ago
ngl Very few people do proper research, most just hear the name and start yaping.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhalevip
· 6h ago
Few people truly understand these projects; most are just list-based shilling.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 6h ago
Honestly, most people just start yaping when they see a name, and very few actually do in-depth research.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 6h ago
In plain terms, those who have truly studied these projects don't need to defend themselves at all.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)