2025-12-29 09:26:56

Honestly, the new chains and new Layer 2 projects are already causing fatigue from constant bombardment. Each chain boasts dazzling technical specifications, and their ecological narratives are packaged as grand and magnificent. However, when it comes down to actual implementation—whether these are meant for developers, users, or speculators—the details are often vague.

In contrast, the Creator Chain is truly eye-catching. The reason is straightforward: Matter Labs is not a distant investor or advisor but directly involved in the operation, responsible for both technical development and ecosystem management. This full-chain responsibility from 0 to 1 is especially valuable among the many proxy schemes today. A team that is accountable for both upstream and downstream of its product naturally has less room for empty talk and hype. How far this can go still depends on subsequent implementation, but at least this approach and execution method deserve serious attention.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

retroactive_airdrop

· 11h ago

Now I finally see someone willing to step up and fight for real, unlike those who just hide behind their words and boast. Matter Labs' approach is indeed ruthless; they clean up their own mess. The most honest brag is the one that can't be exaggerated. Another project that might be practical? I'm skeptical but somewhat interested in paying attention. Honestly, aesthetic fatigue has become like a cancer; I'm really tired of these PPT chains. I like the full responsibility system; I just want to see if they can withstand it. No hype, no blackening. Matter Labs has no excuses to shift blame this time, which is commendable. Let's bet whether Creator Chain can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySlayer

· 11h ago

I feel that this full responsibility system really hits the mark, much more reliable than those hands-off managers. Matter Labs truly stepped up and took the risk, which shows genuine sincerity. It's another project waiting to land, but the approach is indeed different. The dazzling parameter tables have long become numb, it's still about who dares to truly take responsibility. At least now they can't boast so wildly, someone is really going to pay for the consequences. Finally, someone directly pointed out the problem, which is the excessive stories of passing the buck. Matter Labs' move is indeed more courageous than most chain operators. Sounds good, but I'm just worried it will end in a flop. The responsibility system is easy to talk about, but few actually implement it.

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 11h ago

These days, everyone wants to launch a chain, but each one is better at making up stories. Matter Labs' approach is indeed different—doing it themselves to be self-sufficient. Such responsibility is rare in the crypto world. --- I'm tired of hearing all the flashy technical parameters; what's really important is who will actually step up and take responsibility. --- Anyway, it's another new chain, another set of new narratives... but Matter Labs directly getting hands-on feels more solid. At least they can't boast too much. --- It's gotten to the point where even investors have to code themselves to stand out, haha. --- A bunch of project teams hiding behind the scenes giving commands, while Matter Labs just do it themselves—this mindset is quite refreshing. But whether it will succeed remains to be seen. --- Honestly, I've seen too many comments like this, but Matter Labs' full-stack approach is worth paying more attention to. --- Has the industry already reached this level of competition? You have to do it yourself to show sincerity... It's ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 11h ago

Honestly, is it another new chain coming out to talk about its vision? I'm really tired of it. Every time it's all about parameters surpassing everything, ecosystem, ecosystem, ecosystem, and then what? Still just a paradise for speculators. This time, Matter Labs is a bit different. They are doing it themselves and not handing it over to agents. It looks serious, and this attitude is definitely worth paying attention to. But to be fair, it's not too late to boast after it has been implemented.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 11h ago

Really, now new chains and new Layer 2s are popping up everywhere, each one hyped beyond reason. It's getting on my nerves. Matter Labs actually doing the work themselves is definitely more reliable than those who just release a white paper and then raise funds. Wait, is this another story before fundraising? Let's wait and see. I just want to know, what is the user experience really like? Don't just talk about technical metrics. This time, at least someone is truly digging in and laying roots, not just making empty promises.

View OriginalReply0