🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
The stagnation in this round of the market is not because there are no stories to tell, but because everyone is trying to figure out the next sufficiently attractive concept.
AI Meme has indeed become tiresome; aesthetic fatigue is a real phenomenon. But this doesn't mean the game is over. The real issue is—too many project teams choose the easiest way: slap on an AI concept, tweak some code, copy past previous gameplay, and then expect to harvest profits. Don't talk about innovation; this is just mindless copying and pasting.
BTC inscriptions and runes, in essence, are carriers of technical narratives. However, any technical narrative has its own lifecycle: wild growth, bubble burst, value sedimentation, and re-iteration. We are currently stuck in the sedimentation stage, which is a completely normal process.
Looking ahead, the true incremental opportunities are most likely to appear in two areas: one is AI applications that genuinely solve problems and have practical scenarios; the other is entirely disruptive new technological frameworks. But all of this depends on—someone willing to invest effort into genuine innovation, rather than continuing this endless game of concept nesting.
Market liquidity has never been lacking; what is truly scarce are projects worth betting on. In other words, the money is all on the sidelines.