Recently in the investment circle, silver has once again become a hot topic. The underlying logic is actually very straightforward—whenever market liquidity is loose and people fear currency devaluation, these traditional safe-haven assets are repackaged, rebranded, and then make a dazzling comeback.



But here’s a cold hard fact worth digging into.

In the past 50 years, truly significant bull runs in silver have only occurred twice. And the outcome of these two rallies? Without exception, they ended in tragedies where investors lost everything.

**The first story happened in 1980**

The background was a crisis of confidence in the US dollar and runaway global inflation. In such a market environment, silver prices soared from $2 to $50, an increase of over 20 times. Sounds a bit like the crazy crypto assets of that time, doesn’t it?

The main players were the Hunt brothers—a group of wealthy individuals attempting to monopolize the global silver market and challenge the entire financial system. They used heavy leverage, were overconfident, and believed they had cracked the code to wealth.

Then the market taught them a lesson. The exchanges suddenly changed the rules, forced liquidation, and liquidity evaporated instantly. Silver was halved in a single day, countless fortunes vanished, leaving behind a cautionary tale of chaos.

It was then that people realized: in financial markets, you’re never fighting against a specific opponent, but against the system’s own rules.

**The second story happened in 2011**

This time, the background was the era of quantitative easing after the global financial crisis. Silver was packaged as the "poor man’s gold" and the "inflation hedge," pushed to the heights by capital stories.

Retail investors flooded in, pushing the price from $9 to $50. Everyone in the square was shouting "This time is really different"—every bubble starts with such a chorus.

And then? The bubble burst. Prices halved again, followed by a long, decade-long decline. Many who held on with "long-term faith" were silently buried in losses.

**The deadly common point of these two bull markets**

A careful look reveals they made the same mistake: the market capacity was too small, yet it was flooded with surging emotional waves; investors over-leveraged, concentrating risk in a limited liquidity pool; when everyone believed the same story, that story was already nearing its end.

Silver is like a cup with limited capacity. When a huge flood of capital rushes in, the result can only be splashes that eventually lead to a complete collapse.

This is not to deny the value of silver, but to remind a market law: emotion-driven asset prices will ultimately revert to fundamentals. Assets that seem "ancient and stable" can become the biggest risk traps once overhyped.

For any investor, what should be learned from history is not the timing to chase the rally, but the ability to identify bubbles and control risks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ProofOfNothingvip
· 3h ago
1980 and 2011 are both stories of telling stories and then cutting leeks. It's still the same套路, just with different actors. --- "This time really is different," they say every time, but it's always the same dead end. --- Leverage always ends with the same outcome: liquidity disappears just like that. --- Small-capacity plates can't hold so much greed; it will inevitably collapse sooner or later. --- System rules are the hardest punch; fighting against them = giving away money. --- Long-term faith ultimately results in long-term losses, buried by one's own obsession. --- Silver rises to 50 and then falls back; I've seen this show too many times. --- When retail investors swarm in, it's time to know when to withdraw. --- Small capacity with large funds = inevitable explosion, just a math problem. --- The beginning of a bubble is always "this time really is different," too stereotypical.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinorvip
· 4h ago
It's this set again, every time I say "this time it's different", and then I get cut the same
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistakervip
· 4h ago
1980 and 2011, the same story different years, but the ending is equally tragic. Is it happening again? We just can't learn. --- So silver is just an emotional game, with small capacity and poor liquidity. A bunch of people rush in and end up buried together. --- I think the recent moves of the Hunt brothers are being replayed by some coins now, just with different disguises. --- The word "long-term faith," you hear it before every bubble bursts, and it's quite ironic. --- Add leverage, change the rules, and suddenly all your capital is gone. That's why I never hold full positions. --- This article boils down to one sentence: emotions will ultimately return to reality, no exceptions. --- I just want to ask, are people still accumulating silver now? Or have they shifted to other assets? --- Small capacity gets flooded by funds, then crashes. Simple and brutal, but it seems someone always falls into the trap.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuthvip
· 4h ago
It's the same story again. When liquidity loosens, stories are poured into traditional assets, and real information gets drowned in narratives. Don't forget that 1980 and 2011 ended the same way—leverage turns paradise into hell in a second. When the rules change, you're nothing. Things that seem stable are often the most dangerous, and in the end, it's all buried in "faith."
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)