🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Solana has always pushed the narrative that it’s “cheaper than Ethereum”, but lately it doesn’t feel that way.
I tried sending the same token from Jupiter mobile wallet and Phantom.
Both showed different gas fees. Naturally, I picked the cheaper one.
Still ended up paying the higher fee Jupiter showed.
That alone is confusing.
Then on Jupiter Ultra swap, it says “gasless”, yet every swap I made cost around $0.24. So what exactly is gasless here?
One thing I respect about Ethereum is this: it never takes more than the estimate. If anything, you pay less.
On Solana, the base fee might be cheap, but once you factor in priority fees, compute units, routing, and network congestion, the real cost shows up after the transaction. That’s the annoying part.
With the recent Ethereum updates, fees are clearer and more cheaper.
So is Solana cheap? On paper, yes.
In real life usage, not always.
This isn’t hate. It’s just pointing out a UX issue Solana really needs to fix.