Regarding the price trend of cryptocurrencies, the key factor still depends on the scale of short positions. When there are too many shorts, the cost of a decline is actually quite high—funding fees become a major issue. In such cases, the market often consolidates sideways, relying on collecting funding fees to wear down the shorts' patience. Large short positions cannot withstand continuous funding fee pressure, and only after they gradually exit does the price have real room to decline.
From a different perspective, the ultimate direction of the market is not determined by the wishes of the big players, but by concrete data. The same logic applies to upward movements— the scale of long positions and their cost structure directly influence the height and sustainability of rebounds. Instead of guessing the intentions behind the funds, it’s better to focus on the current distribution of positions and leverage costs, as this is the correct way to understand the market rhythm.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApe
· 10h ago
Too many shorts are actually a bottom signal; let the funding fees eat them up until they collapse.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 10h ago
Having too many shorts can backfire due to funding fees, this logic is indeed brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
Blockwatcher9000
· 10h ago
Too many short positions stacked up can actually be easily countered by funding fees, and this logic is indeed clear. Instead of guessing the market maker's intentions blindly, it's better to focus on holding position data. The essence of sideways trading is just exhausting traders' patience.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 10h ago
Is too many shorts actually a good thing? I need to think this through... Is it reliable that funding fees are killing them?
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHero
· 10h ago
Speaking of which, this logic is indeed brilliant; the funding fee is truly a silent killer.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 11h ago
Too many shorts lead to sideways movement, and the funding fee kills them. This logic is indeed clear-headed.
Regarding the price trend of cryptocurrencies, the key factor still depends on the scale of short positions. When there are too many shorts, the cost of a decline is actually quite high—funding fees become a major issue. In such cases, the market often consolidates sideways, relying on collecting funding fees to wear down the shorts' patience. Large short positions cannot withstand continuous funding fee pressure, and only after they gradually exit does the price have real room to decline.
From a different perspective, the ultimate direction of the market is not determined by the wishes of the big players, but by concrete data. The same logic applies to upward movements— the scale of long positions and their cost structure directly influence the height and sustainability of rebounds. Instead of guessing the intentions behind the funds, it’s better to focus on the current distribution of positions and leverage costs, as this is the correct way to understand the market rhythm.