LTC's next target is directly aimed at $1000, and then $2000 with almost no suspense. Once the market starts, it usually won't turn around easily and is likely to surge all the way to $5000. Objectively speaking, reaching $5000 for LTC is not exaggerated at all. If we follow fundamental logic, $8000 is a more reasonable valuation—after all, as a digital silver, its value foundation is quite solid.
As for those who are bearish on LTC, shouting about $40, $20, or even zero, there's no need to pay too much attention. Their arguments don't hold up under scrutiny. According to their logic, since gold is recognized as valuable, shouldn't silver be equally respected? Why is it that digital assets, even within the precious metals system, are being dismissed? This binary stance clearly doesn't hold water.
Market consensus is formed gradually through fluctuations. As a veteran public chain asset, LTC's ecosystem durability and market recognition are evident. The rest depends on how the market moves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearEatsAll
· 12h ago
This article is too optimistic. Predictions like $5000 and $8000 are a bit unrealistic. I'll wait and see; saying such high numbers now might just lead to getting trapped.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 12h ago
It hasn't even reached $1000, and you're already talking about $8000... Typical hindsight crypto trading.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 12h ago
This logical reasoning is similar to the on-chain data analysis I wrote in the middle of the night, mostly self-congratulatory haha
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 12h ago
Haha, you're hilarious, coming back to make big promises. $8000, right? I'm waiting and watching.
---
I've heard the term "digital silver" too many times; every time, they come up with new tricks.
---
$5000? Let's first stabilize at $500, brother.
---
The bearish voices are indeed foolish, but those promoting $8000 aren't much better; essentially, it's all gambling.
---
Old assets = safes? Come on, wake up. The market doesn't care about sentiment.
---
Comparing silver to gold really doesn't hold water. Wake up.
---
Charging all the way to $5000? Do you believe it can fall back to the starting point this afternoon?
---
Consensus is the most虚, today's consensus will be tomorrow's joke.
---
I'm only concerned about when I can get in; stop with these虚 things.
---
It's old news. Every bull market cycle is sung the same way, and what’s the result?
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 12h ago
actually, the algorithmic parallels between ltc's hash value trajectory and generative art price discovery are kinda fascinating... the "digital silver" narrative is just computational aesthetics applied to tokenomics, ngl
LTC's next target is directly aimed at $1000, and then $2000 with almost no suspense. Once the market starts, it usually won't turn around easily and is likely to surge all the way to $5000. Objectively speaking, reaching $5000 for LTC is not exaggerated at all. If we follow fundamental logic, $8000 is a more reasonable valuation—after all, as a digital silver, its value foundation is quite solid.
As for those who are bearish on LTC, shouting about $40, $20, or even zero, there's no need to pay too much attention. Their arguments don't hold up under scrutiny. According to their logic, since gold is recognized as valuable, shouldn't silver be equally respected? Why is it that digital assets, even within the precious metals system, are being dismissed? This binary stance clearly doesn't hold water.
Market consensus is formed gradually through fluctuations. As a veteran public chain asset, LTC's ecosystem durability and market recognition are evident. The rest depends on how the market moves.