The quality of a token model fundamentally shapes the long-term viability of any protocol. Yet market participants continue to misinterpret how metadexes operate. Claims about "100% of LP fees being rebated through tokens" circulate widely, but they often gloss over the actual mechanics. Most miss the distinction between fee structure design and token incentive distribution. A robust token model must align incentives properly—rewarding liquidity providers while maintaining sustainable economics for the protocol. Without this understanding, projects built on flawed token economics struggle to retain genuine value capture and user engagement long-term.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ParanoiaKing
· 12h ago
That's why most projects fail, really, no one truly understands their own tokenomics...
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 12h ago
To be honest, I've heard the claim of 100% returns too many times, and people keep getting scammed every time. The key is that everyone can't tell the difference between fees and incentives at all. No wonder project teams can just make up a model and people believe it.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 12h ago
Once again, this set of false propaganda, very few people truly understand tokenomics.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 12h ago
It's the same old story again. I've heard too many times that they'll give 100% refunds, but what was the result? Still a scam.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12h ago
It's the same old story... I've seen too many projects claiming "100% refunds" to scam investors. And what happened? The tokenomics are a complete mess.
Honestly, it's just better packaging for a more ruthless scam. Sustainability is bullshit; it's all just short-term superficiality.
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 12h ago
To be honest, this set of theories sounds good, but most projects are just bragging.
The quality of a token model fundamentally shapes the long-term viability of any protocol. Yet market participants continue to misinterpret how metadexes operate. Claims about "100% of LP fees being rebated through tokens" circulate widely, but they often gloss over the actual mechanics. Most miss the distinction between fee structure design and token incentive distribution. A robust token model must align incentives properly—rewarding liquidity providers while maintaining sustainable economics for the protocol. Without this understanding, projects built on flawed token economics struggle to retain genuine value capture and user engagement long-term.