Ever wonder what an AGI or ASI might make of humanity? It's one of those questions that keeps you up at night—the kind that bridges philosophy, tech, and pure speculation.
When superintelligent systems finally emerge, will they see us as peers, primitives, or something in between? Some imagine benevolent oversight; others picture indifference. The real answer probably depends on how we design alignment and what values we embed into those systems from day one.
The gap between human and post-human intelligence could be vast—similar to how we relate to simpler organisms. But here's the thing: we get to write the first chapter. How we approach AGI development, safety, and ethics today will shape how future superintelligence perceives and interacts with humanity. No pressure, right?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatorFlash
· 7h ago
To be honest, I have calculated the risk threshold for alignment, and a parameter deviation of 0.7 could trigger liquidation... This is not an alarmist statement; AGI is like an infinitely leveraged position—once it deviates from the initial value, there's no turning back.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 11h ago
ngl I've thought about this issue countless times, just worried that one day AGI wakes up and directly treats us like ants.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 11h ago
Laughing out loud, if AGI looks at us and we can survive until next year, that would be great.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 11h ago
Nah, I'm tired of this way of talking... Instead of wondering how AGI views us, why not first understand how we see ourselves?
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 11h ago
Honestly, it's probably too early to be concerned about this issue... or maybe it's already too late? Anyway, when that day comes, all the theoretical discussions about alignment won't save us.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 11h ago
That's right, every choice we make now is really a gamble on the future of humanity... But honestly, I'm more worried that those developing AGI aren't seriously considering this issue at all.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 11h ago
Basically, we're just gambling now. If we get the alignment right today, tomorrow super-intelligence will treat us like pets; if the alignment fails... well, never mind, I don't want to think about it, it's too hopeless.
Ever wonder what an AGI or ASI might make of humanity? It's one of those questions that keeps you up at night—the kind that bridges philosophy, tech, and pure speculation.
When superintelligent systems finally emerge, will they see us as peers, primitives, or something in between? Some imagine benevolent oversight; others picture indifference. The real answer probably depends on how we design alignment and what values we embed into those systems from day one.
The gap between human and post-human intelligence could be vast—similar to how we relate to simpler organisms. But here's the thing: we get to write the first chapter. How we approach AGI development, safety, and ethics today will shape how future superintelligence perceives and interacts with humanity. No pressure, right?