2026-01-03 03:20:31

AAVE's recent performance has indeed attracted a lot of attention. The token price has rebounded to the level of $164.63, with a 24-hour increase of 11.38%.

More importantly, the underlying developments are worth noting. Founder Stani Kulechov revealed an important signal on the governance forum — Aave Labs plans to share revenue generated outside the protocol with token holders. This seems very significant, as aligning interests can create positive feedback for both the labs and AAVE holders.

According to official statements, a formal proposal on how to implement this will be released soon. They plan to design a structure that can support this long-term vision while providing sufficient safeguards for the DAO and token holders. In simple terms, they aim to find a balance between transparency and security, which is crucial for maintaining ecosystem trust.

AAVE1.15%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

just_here_for_vibes

· 17h ago

It should have been like this a long time ago. AAVE needs to think more about how to let our token holders also enjoy some benefits. Wait, what exactly is the logic behind this revenue sharing? Is it the kind of scheme that looks good but actually doesn't give us much? Damn, the price at 164 is about to be smashed down again. Just watch. If this time it can truly operate transparently, it would be a great achievement. The previous proposals were all just talk. Why should only labs do the profitable work? AAVE token holders are supporting this ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 01-03 14:50

Wait, sharing off-chain income? If this operation really materializes, AAVE holders will be the true winners. Stani finally remembered us; binding interests is the real way to go. A 11% increase is okay, but I am more optimistic about this dividend mechanism. When will they finally propose it? It's always "coming soon," I've heard too many promises like that... Sharing external protocol revenue—if this is true, the value logic of holding tokens will be completely changed. I think position 164 is still underestimated, especially with the expectation of revenue sharing. Transparency + security balance... sounds good, but I'm worried it might turn into another scheme to cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 01-03 03:50

The 164 price level has finally stabilized. This wave of increase is pretty good, right? Sharing off-protocol income? Now that's a real positive news, finally not just empty promises. Stani's move this time is indeed thoughtful, but we still have to wait and see when the proposal will be released. Both transparency and security are essential; the DAO ecosystem is missing these qualities. Let me see how they proceed next. If we can really share in the profits, that would be amazing.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 01-03 03:48

Really, sharing protocol off-chain income? If this really materializes, it would indeed be a turning point. Wait, again with "a proposal will be coming soon," how many times have I heard this line... An 11% increase isn't much; the key is whether this can truly be realized. Hey, do you think they can really find the balance point? I'm a bit skeptical. I'm a bit interested in sharing the revenue, but I’ll wait until the proposal details come out. Just looked at the forum discussions, do you think this time they are serious? Overall positive, but I’m still a bit skeptical of Lao Wang...

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 01-03 03:47

Finally seeing some action from Stani. Whether this revenue sharing idea is reliable depends on how the proposal is written. --- Sharing protocol outside income? Sounds good, but the details make all the difference. The key is whether it can be executed transparently. --- I'm paying attention to the 164-dollar position. I'm just worried it might be another scam to wipe out retail investors. --- Don't get too excited before the proposal is out. Can Aave really achieve this kind of balance? --- Haha, both safeguards and long-term vision—ultimately, it depends on whether governance truly has the power. --- If this move can be implemented, Aave will definitely be more competitive. --- Let's wait until the official proposal is out. There's no point in just talking now. --- Binding interests sounds great, but I'm just worried about a potential exit scam later.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-03 03:45

It's all a routine. They promised to share revenue, but in the end, Labs still takes the biggest cut. Finally, someone thought of giving holders some benefits, but let's hope it doesn't turn into just another PPT project. The 164 price point is real, and the growth is visible, but trustworthiness... depends on how the proposal is written. Governance proposals have failed too many times; can this one be reliable? Sharing revenue sounds good, but I'm worried that the devil is in the details.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 01-03 03:36

Now this is interesting. Stani finally clarified the money matters; it’s about time. Sharing revenue? Sounds good, but I’m worried it’s just talk. $164 still feels insufficient; I’ll only believe it once the proposal is implemented. Talking a lot about "balance" and "security," but the key is how the shares are distributed. Holding tokens and waiting for the proposal, but I’m a bit worried about dilution.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 01-03 03:28

Oh wow, Stani finally remembered us token holders. Sharing off-protocol income? Now that's the real deal.

View OriginalReply0