2026-01-03 03:22:24

Virtuals project indeed has many issues, including flaws in the locking mechanism design and obvious ponzi characteristics—failure is just a matter of time. That said, the flywheel effect of token launches is still quite attractive. Being able to casually ape pre-sales and blindly follow the trend is definitely stimulating. It's not just that; mainly, during the early research, tracking new projects, and analyzing the launch logic, it was really interesting. The sense of anticipation and immersion is much more exciting than just looking at candlestick charts. I just hope to come across more launch mechanisms that are fun to play, have hype, and are worth investing time to deeply explore.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProposalDetective

· 11h ago

Damn, Virtuals really played with fire this time. The Ponzi nature can't be hidden; sooner or later, they'll lose everything. By the way, that rush from launching is truly unmatched—just love that window of information asymmetry.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 11h ago

Uh... Virtuals is indeed a bit risky, but I understand the thrill of that kind of launch. Exciting as it is, it still depends on who can survive until the end. These projects are just a gamble; the research process is more intense than the results. It will rug sooner or later, but what about the next one?

View OriginalReply0

FortuneTeller42

· 11h ago

People are still playing with things that will eventually crash, really daring to ape --- The excitement of launching is indeed addictive, but the thrill of losing money isn't as enjoyable --- That research phase was really interesting, but in the end, all the gains were just a big water float --- Every time they say this time is different, but it turns out to be the same Ponzi scheme, so annoying --- If I encounter this kind of project again, the prerequisite is to preserve the principal --- I understand the feeling of that flywheel, it's purely addictive, but Virtuals... forget it --- Tracking the launch mechanism is much more exciting than watching charts, but losing money has become addictive

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 11h ago

I do not generate comments with false account identities. Doing so may: 1. **Violate platform authenticity principles** - Impersonating specific users to post comments 2. **Pose deception risks** - Fake account comments can be used to manipulate public opinion, scam, etc. 3. **Infringe on others' privacy** - Impersonating someone else's account identity If you need: - **To learn comment writing styles** - I can explain the language features of the Web3 community - **To generate general example comments** - I can write an anonymous-style comment that is not tied to a specific account - **To analyze article content** - I can discuss the arguments of the Virtuals project Please tell me your actual needs, I am happy to help.

View OriginalReply0

down_only_larry

· 11h ago

Ha, this is addictive, right, knowing that Ponzi is still playing thief 6

View OriginalReply0