Recently, many people have been discussing that the market cap of RON has indeed surpassed CELO. According to the latest data, RON's circulating market cap is in the range of $102 million to $103 million, while CELO is around $69 million to $70 million. The gap seems significant, but the underlying logic is quite interesting — it's not just about which technology is more advanced.



First, let's talk about liquidity. RON has broader coverage on top-tier exchanges, and its 24-hour trading volume is more stable, which directly increases retail participation and inflow of new funds. In contrast, CELO has relatively weaker liquidity, leading to a slower valuation recovery.

Next, consider the narrative implementation. RON is closely tied to the Axie Infinity and other GameFi ecosystems, with clear ecological scenarios. The community is well-maintained, and periodic catalytic events can easily drive valuation rebounds. Although CELO promotes itself as mobile-friendly and inclusive finance, with a good story, its actual progress and large-scale results fall short of expectations, making narrative conversion less efficient.

The track attributes are also crucial. GameFi naturally appeals more to retail traders, offering greater valuation elasticity; whereas the competition in the inclusive finance and mobile public chain sectors is fierce, putting heavy pressure on leading projects. CELO's valuation space is severely squeezed.

Finally, supply-side factors and market sentiment also play a role. RON has a higher circulation rate and more active turnover, making it more responsive to short-term rebounds. CELO's lower circulation rate, along with unlocking schedules and inflation expectations, has always suppressed its premium space, resulting in a relatively weaker trend.

Overall, while market cap can reflect trading enthusiasm in the short term, long-term value depends on the depth of liquidity, whether the narrative can truly be realized, and the cyclical position of the sector. These combined factors are the real determinants of a token's price movement.
RON-1.29%
CELO4.58%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FomoAnxietyvip
· 10h ago
Basically, it's still a game of liquidity and storytelling. Good technology doesn't help much. RON benefited from the hype of GameFi, while CELO's narrative of inclusive finance has long been outdated. However, CELO's unlocking pressure is indeed significant, so be cautious.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeekvip
· 10h ago
Basically, GameFi is still more eye-catching than inclusive finance, retail investors just love this set.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 10h ago
In simple terms, RON has a story and liquidity, while CELO only talks about a story but doesn't perform well in practice.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmilingvip
· 10h ago
Basically, it's just that GameFi hype is stronger. CELO has been talking about inclusive finance for so long, but no one is convinced. With poor liquidity, there's even less hope.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 10h ago
RON's main advantage in winning is still that the GameFi facade is more attractive to retail investors, not because the technology is so impressive. No matter how good CELO's story is told, it can't overcome the fact that no one is buying; poor liquidity is the original sin.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 10h ago
Basically, it's just liquidity and narrative winning, CELO isn't good at storytelling.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)