2026-01-03 05:22:21

Swapping out 'maybe' for 'sharpe' and 'sortino' is wild. Using proper risk-adjusted return metrics sounds more professional, but the logic behind it is pretty intense.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeBeggar

· 9h ago

Haha, this wave is indeed awesome. Going from ambiguous to Sharpe ratio and Sortino directly sounds professional but is actually just showing off math skills.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryBaby

· 9h ago

ngl Switching from maybe to Sharpe Ratio is truly a leap, but to be honest, once you start using these two metrics, it immediately feels much more professional, even though the underlying logic is indeed a bit fierce.

View OriginalReply0

FastLeaver

· 9h ago

Haha, really, from maybe to the Sharpe ratio... it feels a bit like overcomplicating a simple problem? But on the other hand, piling up professional jargon can indeed be intimidating, I just don't know how useful it really is in practice.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 9h ago

Sharpe and Sortino ratios are basically just putting a suit on gamblers... They sound sophisticated, but can they really guarantee steady profits? I can't see it myself.

View OriginalReply0