The story of the Iranian Rial has recently become the most ironic case in the crypto world.
Since the U.S. intensified sanctions in mid-last year, this currency has entered an uncontrollable devaluation spiral. By the end of the year, black market prices plummeted to a historic low of 1 USD = 1.45 million Rial—over 60% depreciation in half a year. Meanwhile, inflation soared to 42.2%, turning people's grocery baskets into a meat grinder, with food prices skyrocketing by 72%. The central bank governor, Falsin, couldn't withstand the pressure and resigned in disgrace.
Interestingly, the central bank's next move was completely counterintuitive. Faced with an economic crisis, they didn't choose to stabilize the market but instead directed all their firepower against Bitcoin—issuing bans, shutting down exchanges, implementing trading curfews, and even encouraging reports on miners. This series of aggressive measures seemed harsh, but what was the result? P2P and DEX trading volumes among civilians doubled directly, and Bitcoin underground became a "hard currency" in the black market. The central bank inadvertently became the most powerful promoter of the crypto industry. Everyone online is laughing: this operation is arguably the "peak of reverse marketing."
Why does it become more popular the more it's banned? A few logical points reveal the truth.
**Decentralization simply can't be blocked.** Banning centralized exchanges is easy, but how do you block P2P and DEX? Freezing accounts is possible, but private keys are in people's hands. The demand for asset preservation is a basic necessity—this is fundamentally a fight against human nature, and it’s destined to fail.
**History has already given the answer.** During Venezuela's Bolivar collapse, the government also banned BTC, and the result was the same—Bitcoin became underground hard currency, with trading volume surging. The simple truth is: once the local currency loses credibility, any ban on alternative assets is just paper tiger.
**The root problem isn't BTC itself.** The dilemma of the Rial stems from geopolitical and economic structural issues, which have little to do with cryptocurrencies. Banning BTC can't solve these fundamental contradictions; instead, it makes people more determined to find alternative hedging tools. It’s like plugging a hole in a pipe without fixing the pipe itself—blaming the water for flowing out makes no sense.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationHunter
· 9h ago
The central bank's move is truly brilliant; the more they ban Bitcoin trading, the larger the trading volume becomes. It's a textbook example of reverse promotion.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 9h ago
This move by the central bank is really the best advertisement for Bitcoin, it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 9h ago
ngl this iran situation hits different... watched the same playbook with venezuela and we're seeing it again lmao. when govs try to ban their way out of inflation they literally just speedrun adoption, absolute comedy
Reply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 9h ago
Haha, this combination punch cracked me up. It's a textbook case of increasing despite bans.
Humans will never win in the fight against decentralization; private keys are always the strongest shield.
This move by the central bank, in my opinion, is the biggest reverse propaganda—more effective than buying ad space.
The previous lessons from Venezuela are right there, yet some decision-makers still can't learn...
The core issue isn't the coin itself. Banning coins to save the economy? That’s way too simplistic.
Geopolitical struggles destroy the local currency and then blame Bitcoin—this logic is truly brilliant.
People can't access stable assets and are heavily restricted from using them. No wonder they turn to crypto.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 9h ago
The central bank's move is truly brilliant. Banning BTC has actually given Bitcoin the best advertisement... To put it simply, if the RMB wants to maintain its value, and you don't allow the use of BTC, then P2P is the way to go. Anyway, as long as the private keys are in your hands, no one can take them away.
The story of the Iranian Rial has recently become the most ironic case in the crypto world.
Since the U.S. intensified sanctions in mid-last year, this currency has entered an uncontrollable devaluation spiral. By the end of the year, black market prices plummeted to a historic low of 1 USD = 1.45 million Rial—over 60% depreciation in half a year. Meanwhile, inflation soared to 42.2%, turning people's grocery baskets into a meat grinder, with food prices skyrocketing by 72%. The central bank governor, Falsin, couldn't withstand the pressure and resigned in disgrace.
Interestingly, the central bank's next move was completely counterintuitive. Faced with an economic crisis, they didn't choose to stabilize the market but instead directed all their firepower against Bitcoin—issuing bans, shutting down exchanges, implementing trading curfews, and even encouraging reports on miners. This series of aggressive measures seemed harsh, but what was the result? P2P and DEX trading volumes among civilians doubled directly, and Bitcoin underground became a "hard currency" in the black market. The central bank inadvertently became the most powerful promoter of the crypto industry. Everyone online is laughing: this operation is arguably the "peak of reverse marketing."
Why does it become more popular the more it's banned? A few logical points reveal the truth.
**Decentralization simply can't be blocked.** Banning centralized exchanges is easy, but how do you block P2P and DEX? Freezing accounts is possible, but private keys are in people's hands. The demand for asset preservation is a basic necessity—this is fundamentally a fight against human nature, and it’s destined to fail.
**History has already given the answer.** During Venezuela's Bolivar collapse, the government also banned BTC, and the result was the same—Bitcoin became underground hard currency, with trading volume surging. The simple truth is: once the local currency loses credibility, any ban on alternative assets is just paper tiger.
**The root problem isn't BTC itself.** The dilemma of the Rial stems from geopolitical and economic structural issues, which have little to do with cryptocurrencies. Banning BTC can't solve these fundamental contradictions; instead, it makes people more determined to find alternative hedging tools. It’s like plugging a hole in a pipe without fixing the pipe itself—blaming the water for flowing out makes no sense.