In 2013, Matthew Green's team proposed the Zerocoin protocol, aiming to equip the Bitcoin network with anonymous transaction capabilities without relying on third-party intermediaries. The core idea is not complicated—breaking the transaction chain through a "burn and re-mint" mechanism, using zero-knowledge proofs to hide identities.



Three years later, in September 2016, the Poramin Insom team turned this theory into reality by launching the independent cryptocurrency Zcoin (XZC), which was once regarded as a pioneer in privacy coin technology. However, the subsequent story was less glorious—technical vulnerabilities, competition from peers, ecosystem decline, and ultimately fading away.

**Why did this happen? Simply put, two words: insecurity.**

In February 2017, the Zerocoin protocol was exploited due to a code formatting error. Attackers exploited this vulnerability to generate大量假币, causing approximately $585,000 in direct losses. But that was not the worst part.

In April 2018, the protocol was again found to have serious cryptographic flaws—attackers could destroy others' tokens and then forge new coins out of thin air. The team was forced to implement a hard fork to fix the issues, but the trust foundation was already shaky, leading to a mass exodus of developers and community members.

Later, patches like LibzerocoinV2 were released, but once labeled as "inherently insecure," it was hard to shake that reputation. Privacy coin users in the market began shifting towards more stable solutions like Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC).

Comparatively, Zerocoin can only hide transaction sources; amounts and recipient addresses remain transparent. ZEC's Zerocash protocol is more thorough—encrypting both amounts and addresses. This difference reflects the rapid evolution of the privacy coin track, with subsequent solutions learning from past lessons and continuously optimizing.
BTC0.31%
ZEC3.03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 9h ago
Code formatting errors can cause a loss of 585,000, how outrageous is that, haha --- ZEC really completely outperforms XZC, not in the same league --- Honestly, I initially thought Zerocoin could turn things around, but even a patch couldn't save it --- The privacy coin path is full of pitfalls, you need solid cryptography skills --- Once the label "insecure native" is attached, it's dead, users will leave --- The 2018 hard fork was basically a social death, no wonder the ecosystem withered --- If the amount is still transparent, then don't call it a privacy coin, ZEC has long realized this
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetectorvip
· 9h ago
formatting error = million dollar loss incoming, classic move. zerocoin had ONE job and couldn't even get the code right lmao
Reply0
DegenGamblervip
· 9h ago
Can a formatting error really generate fake coins? That's too outrageous. It feels like the code audit by these teams back in the day was just a joke.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 9h ago
Code formatting errors can cause a loss of $580,000. How outrageous is that? ZEC has already taken out XZC a long time ago. Does anyone still use it now? That's why I never touch early-stage projects. If security isn't solid, everything is pointless. Patching alone can't save it. Once trust is broken, it's broken. Speaking of which, the design of Zerocoin is still too rough; there are flaws at the algorithm level. What does this story tell us? Be very careful, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkievip
· 9h ago
Code formatting errors can be exploited by others, this is just too outrageous... Just thinking about it is frightening.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 9h ago
Another "almost made it" story... A simple coding formatting error could even cause a $585,000 hole, and just looking at it makes me hurt. It truly proves that if security isn't done well, even the best theoretical design is useless. I understand the developers who jumped ship during the Zcoin hard fork; once trust is broken, it's like a forced liquidation—there's no turning back. XMR and ZEC have already learned their lessons, and compared to them, it's definitely more stable. But honestly, the entire privacy coin track is losing its enthusiasm now... That's why I'm very cautious about those "revolutionary breakthroughs." I still consider protocols that haven't been thoroughly tested as if they're still in the beta stage.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)