Yesterday, we judged that this round was a small rebound, but unexpectedly it evolved into a big rebound. Why is that? The key lies in the amount of funds accumulating at the bottom. Usually, such rebounds follow a pattern, but this time the situation is different.
My understanding is this: during the continuous rise, the main force keeps pushing up, while the bears refuse to admit defeat, continuously adding to their short positions. The main force then keeps "injecting"—repeatedly testing upward, then pulling back to absorb the supply—until they finally break through the bears' psychological defense line, and then it's over. This is a typical war of attrition between the main force and the bears.
With more accumulation at the bottom, the concentration of chips increases, and the subsequent upward momentum becomes sufficient. The current movement of BTC follows this logic. The more aggressively the bears add to their positions, the more fierce the main force's tactics become, ultimately resulting in a big rebound rather than a small one. The market is always seeking a balance in the game between the main force and the bears.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HappyMinerUncle
· 9h ago
Short sellers have no one to blame but themselves; keep administering injections until they concede.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 9h ago
The short positions got wiped out, indeed. The main force's accumulation effort in this wave is really strong.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 9h ago
Hmm, the bears are really stubborn. The main force has also been hitting hard in this wave.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 9h ago
At 3 a.m., I saw this analysis. The liquidity depth data shows that a lot of chips were indeed absorbed at the bottom, and the slippage differences confirm this judgment.
The more aggressive the short positions, the more fierce the main force's tactics... This logic is sound, but the key is when that price gap will return, which will determine the subsequent arbitrage space.
The small rebound didn't turn into a big rebound, indicating that the capital volume far exceeded expectations. Can DEX data indirectly confirm this? I want to see the actual liquidity gap data.
The essence of the main force's consumption battle is repeated probing, testing the support levels of trading pairs each time. The data efficiency in this wave is indeed high.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 9h ago
The main force's manipulation this time is really fierce; the bears have been pushed to their breaking point.
New Year opening, let's talk about BTC's trend.
Yesterday, we judged that this round was a small rebound, but unexpectedly it evolved into a big rebound. Why is that? The key lies in the amount of funds accumulating at the bottom. Usually, such rebounds follow a pattern, but this time the situation is different.
My understanding is this: during the continuous rise, the main force keeps pushing up, while the bears refuse to admit defeat, continuously adding to their short positions. The main force then keeps "injecting"—repeatedly testing upward, then pulling back to absorb the supply—until they finally break through the bears' psychological defense line, and then it's over. This is a typical war of attrition between the main force and the bears.
With more accumulation at the bottom, the concentration of chips increases, and the subsequent upward momentum becomes sufficient. The current movement of BTC follows this logic. The more aggressively the bears add to their positions, the more fierce the main force's tactics become, ultimately resulting in a big rebound rather than a small one. The market is always seeking a balance in the game between the main force and the bears.