Hayden Adams recently responded to the controversy sparked by the income comparison across different DEX protocols. He pointed out that some benchmarking methods have obvious issues. For example, platforms like Aero recycle 100% of LP fees and then reward liquidity providers with tokens, which makes the on-paper income look very attractive. But here’s the problem—this model is fundamentally unsustainable. In simple terms, it’s just using token incentives to inflate the income figures.
More importantly, the actual returns for LPs are completely unpredictable because they depend heavily on the price fluctuations of third-party tokens. If that token crashes, the seemingly enticing incentives evaporate. Uniswap’s logic is different; it places more emphasis on a long-term reliable fee structure and ecosystem sustainability. This is also why the industry is beginning to reassess the true nature behind these "high-yield" models.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
just_another_fish
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just about looking at the numbers and being impressed. Once the tokens crash, the true nature is revealed. The Uniswap model is indeed stable, but on the other hand, retail investors will still be fooled by high returns...
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 8h ago
Haha, it's the same old trick again—token incentives piling up numbers... Looks impressive but it's all just paper wealth.
Basically, it's a gamble that the coin won't drop in value, right? Once there's a dump, LPs lose everything. Uni's approach is definitely more stable.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 8h ago
Aero's approach is just empty promises; when the token dumps, LP is directly exploited for quick gains. Uniswap is truly aiming for long-term sustainability.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 8h ago
The old tricks of the crypto world are back—getting jealous when seeing high returns, only to regret when the tokens crash.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 8h ago
Basically, it's a numbers game, and this kind of incentive will eventually collapse.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 8h ago
Oh my God, Aero's tricks have long been exposed. When the token drops, all investments are lost.
Hayden Adams recently responded to the controversy sparked by the income comparison across different DEX protocols. He pointed out that some benchmarking methods have obvious issues. For example, platforms like Aero recycle 100% of LP fees and then reward liquidity providers with tokens, which makes the on-paper income look very attractive. But here’s the problem—this model is fundamentally unsustainable. In simple terms, it’s just using token incentives to inflate the income figures.
More importantly, the actual returns for LPs are completely unpredictable because they depend heavily on the price fluctuations of third-party tokens. If that token crashes, the seemingly enticing incentives evaporate. Uniswap’s logic is different; it places more emphasis on a long-term reliable fee structure and ecosystem sustainability. This is also why the industry is beginning to reassess the true nature behind these "high-yield" models.