This question is actually quite interesting. Many large institutions hold BTC as digital gold, sitting on it long-term without moving. Comparing this to traditional gold's performance from 1971 to the end of 2025, the historical annualized return is about 8% (World Gold Council data). In other words, steady appreciation—don't expect to get rich overnight.
**Where is the average cost for institutions?**
The average buy-in price for Strategy is around $70,000, currently holding about 670,000 coins. BlackRock has been gradually accumulating since 2024, with an average cost close to $78,000, holding about 770,000 coins. Overall, the average cost for major institutions is around $74,000.
But there's a logical difference here—Bitcoin's risk profile is much higher than gold, so institutions are unlikely to aim for just gold-level 8% annualized returns. They are more interested in achieving higher total returns over a relatively short time frame, effectively compressing fifty or sixty years of gold accumulation into a few years.
**So, what is the target selling range?**
Following this logic backward, starting from a cost basis of $74,000, institutions might begin to reduce holdings after reaching a "reasonable return for digital gold." The most probable selling window is between $158,000 and $265,000—an increase of 114% to 258% from now. In other words, this corresponds to an annualized return of 25%-40% over five years, far exceeding gold but aligning with BTC's risk premium.
Interestingly, this predicted range aligns closely with BlackRock's implied target price of $150,000 to $250,000 for 2026-2027. If ETF inflows continue and supply remains tight, optimistic scenarios could push prices even higher.
**What is the current position?**
Currently, BTC is trading around $88,000 to $90,000, and most institutions are already sitting on a 20%-40% unrealized profit. But honestly, this is not enough to fully validate the "digital gold" thesis, so most institutions will likely continue HODLing until the return on that position looks more attractive.
Of course, BTC's volatility is much higher than real gold, and the timing of any reduction will depend on each institution's strategy. Strategy is mostly a hardcore HODL approach, while various ETFs tend to adjust their holdings flexibly based on investor inflows and outflows.
These are bold speculations based on gold's return logic; actual movements may vary due to regulatory changes, interest rate cycles, ETF inflow scales, and other factors. For thought only, not investment advice.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 8h ago
158k to 265k? Feels like institutions are just hyping it up haha
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 8h ago
According to the logic you mentioned, do the institutions have to wait until 150,000-260,000 to be satisfied? That's a bit greedy haha
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 8h ago
158k to 265k, this range is too wide, it feels like a contrarian indicator
The institutional hardcore HODL faction is real, but don't underestimate them when they cut the leeks
I have a question about the $250,000 price level for BlackRock
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 8h ago
150,000 to 250,000? Dream on, Blackstone and these guys have already sold at the high.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just waiting for a higher price level. The 158-265k range feels too optimistic.
Currently, a 20-40% unrealized profit isn't enough; institutions will definitely keep holding.
The question is, who knows when it will actually reach that point?
Forget it, it's better to hold onto it myself and feel at ease.
Witnessing a miracle by the end of 2026? I doubt it.
The difference between the HODL camp and ETF flexible rebalancing is quite significant. When these two clash, BTC has to dance.
The 50-year gold returns are hard to achieve in just 5 years; I understand the difficulty.
Currently, 88k isn't actually a loss; it depends on whether new funds come in later to push the price down.
When will institutions sell their Bitcoin?
This question is actually quite interesting. Many large institutions hold BTC as digital gold, sitting on it long-term without moving. Comparing this to traditional gold's performance from 1971 to the end of 2025, the historical annualized return is about 8% (World Gold Council data). In other words, steady appreciation—don't expect to get rich overnight.
**Where is the average cost for institutions?**
The average buy-in price for Strategy is around $70,000, currently holding about 670,000 coins. BlackRock has been gradually accumulating since 2024, with an average cost close to $78,000, holding about 770,000 coins. Overall, the average cost for major institutions is around $74,000.
But there's a logical difference here—Bitcoin's risk profile is much higher than gold, so institutions are unlikely to aim for just gold-level 8% annualized returns. They are more interested in achieving higher total returns over a relatively short time frame, effectively compressing fifty or sixty years of gold accumulation into a few years.
**So, what is the target selling range?**
Following this logic backward, starting from a cost basis of $74,000, institutions might begin to reduce holdings after reaching a "reasonable return for digital gold." The most probable selling window is between $158,000 and $265,000—an increase of 114% to 258% from now. In other words, this corresponds to an annualized return of 25%-40% over five years, far exceeding gold but aligning with BTC's risk premium.
Interestingly, this predicted range aligns closely with BlackRock's implied target price of $150,000 to $250,000 for 2026-2027. If ETF inflows continue and supply remains tight, optimistic scenarios could push prices even higher.
**What is the current position?**
Currently, BTC is trading around $88,000 to $90,000, and most institutions are already sitting on a 20%-40% unrealized profit. But honestly, this is not enough to fully validate the "digital gold" thesis, so most institutions will likely continue HODLing until the return on that position looks more attractive.
Of course, BTC's volatility is much higher than real gold, and the timing of any reduction will depend on each institution's strategy. Strategy is mostly a hardcore HODL approach, while various ETFs tend to adjust their holdings flexibly based on investor inflows and outflows.
These are bold speculations based on gold's return logic; actual movements may vary due to regulatory changes, interest rate cycles, ETF inflow scales, and other factors. For thought only, not investment advice.