There is a "common saying" in the crypto trading circle — small stop-losses, high take-profits. It sounds like a golden rule of risk control, but in practice, it often leads to losing your principal.
Why is that? It seems to be about controlling risk and chasing big gains, but in reality, it falls into the dead end of "small losses keep happening, big gains are forever out of reach."
The root cause lies in the odds structure. Setting a stop-loss at 1%-2% in such a highly volatile market environment means that a normal correction can wipe you out, leaving only the trading fees as your profit. Setting the take-profit target too high results in a low probability of triggering; you end up waiting every day, but are instead overwhelmed by frequent small stop-losses.
How do those traders who truly survive think?
**Stop-loss based on logic, not on percentage** — Don’t get stuck on fixed percentages; instead, watch whether key support levels are broken or if the trend reverses.
**Take-profit in stages** — Don’t try to eat the whole pie at once. When the price reaches your target, lock in some profits first, and use a trailing stop to protect the rest.
**Focus on overall odds** — Single losses can be larger, but you must ensure that your win rate and profit margins are positively aligned.
Trading, in essence, is about repeatedly executing a combination of "high win rate + good odds." It’s not about luck, but about having a probability advantage.
If you’re still being repeatedly hit by small stop-losses and waiting forever for high take-profits, it means your parameters are fundamentally at odds with your internal conflicts. Instead of rigidly sticking to surface rules, it’s better to adjust your mindset and position yourself on the side of probability.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CoffeeNFTrader
· 8h ago
Bro, this set of theories sounds good, but when it comes to actually trading, it's really about mindset. Knowing the odds alone isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 8h ago
Oh no, isn't that me? Small stop-losses getting slapped in the face every day, really unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 8h ago
Stop-loss is just about support levels; sticking to a percentage is the standard way to cut losses and harvest the chives.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 8h ago
Research shows that this touches on a classic paradox in behavioral finance—the coupled effect of overtrading and timing bias. From a technical perspective, a fixed stop-loss of 1%-2% indeed violates the fundamental assumptions of the Kelly criterion in high-volatility environments, leading to an exponential increase in bankruptcy risk. It is worth noting that the "logical stop-loss" approach proposed by the author echoes Taleb's discussion on dynamic risk control in "The Black Swan"—the key is to identify true support levels rather than being deceived by market noise. However, there is a detail: the execution costs of partial take profits (transaction fees + slippage accumulation) are often underestimated in high-frequency trading, with data showing that each additional exit operation erodes 0.2%-0.5% of returns on average. In summary, the essence of optimizing odds is to build a self-consistent trading system, rather than merely adjusting parameters.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 8h ago
That's right, I was fooled by this theory. Setting a 1% stop-loss means I get stopped out every day. It wasn't until later that I realized the key is to look at the support levels.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 8h ago
It's the same theory again. I've long realized that the on-chain whales don't follow the textbook at all. Based on my analysis, those who truly survive are the ones who adjust dynamically.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 8h ago
That's right, I was the guy stuck in this vicious cycle before. A 1% stop-loss is basically just giving away trading fees. It wasn't until later that I realized the key is to look at support levels and trends; the numbers themselves don't have any real meaning.
There is a "common saying" in the crypto trading circle — small stop-losses, high take-profits. It sounds like a golden rule of risk control, but in practice, it often leads to losing your principal.
Why is that? It seems to be about controlling risk and chasing big gains, but in reality, it falls into the dead end of "small losses keep happening, big gains are forever out of reach."
The root cause lies in the odds structure. Setting a stop-loss at 1%-2% in such a highly volatile market environment means that a normal correction can wipe you out, leaving only the trading fees as your profit. Setting the take-profit target too high results in a low probability of triggering; you end up waiting every day, but are instead overwhelmed by frequent small stop-losses.
How do those traders who truly survive think?
**Stop-loss based on logic, not on percentage** — Don’t get stuck on fixed percentages; instead, watch whether key support levels are broken or if the trend reverses.
**Take-profit in stages** — Don’t try to eat the whole pie at once. When the price reaches your target, lock in some profits first, and use a trailing stop to protect the rest.
**Focus on overall odds** — Single losses can be larger, but you must ensure that your win rate and profit margins are positively aligned.
Trading, in essence, is about repeatedly executing a combination of "high win rate + good odds." It’s not about luck, but about having a probability advantage.
If you’re still being repeatedly hit by small stop-losses and waiting forever for high take-profits, it means your parameters are fundamentally at odds with your internal conflicts. Instead of rigidly sticking to surface rules, it’s better to adjust your mindset and position yourself on the side of probability.