2026-01-03 06:26:18

Recently, various voices have been flooding my private messages. "An analyst from a certain research institution predicts that Bitcoin will plummet 55% in 2026," "Silver premiums have soared to 73%, should we now run away"—similar anxieties keep coming. Frankly, this is not surprising. After all, the words "downward warning" can indeed strike a nerve in any investor. But I want to point out: don’t let a single indicator or an analyst’s opinion dictate your judgment. Regarding the prospects of these two assets in 2026, the real decisive factors are not the 50-week moving average, but two deep variables that most people overlook.

First, let’s clarify a common cognitive trap: the 50-week moving average is actually more like a "barometer of sentiment," rather than a "total switch for price movements." Beginners often get nervous when they see prices far from the moving average, but there’s no need to. What truly matters is whether there is substantial support below after the price deviates.

Take the recent silver rally as an example. Behind the 73% premium, it appears to be "a safe-haven surge triggered by expectations of a global economic recession" plus "rising industrial demand." But the problem is, both of these pillars are actually quite fragile. The recession theme has been hyped for half a year, yet recent economic data shows signs of mild recovery, and risk aversion sentiment could dissipate at any time. As for industrial demand, silver’s main exports are in photovoltaic and electronic fields. Even if demand in these areas grows by 10%, it’s far from supporting a 73% price increase. The numbers simply don’t add up.

Looking at Bitcoin, some insist that "if the price falls below the 50-week moving average, it’s time for a rebound," while an analyst from a certain research institution says it will continue to decline by another 55%. These two viewpoints seem contradictory, but the real issue lies in the misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s true driving forces. What determines Bitcoin’s direction in 2026? It’s not a line on a chart, but macro policy environment, institutional fund flows, and the overall valuation logic of global risk assets. These are the things that truly deserve close attention.

BTC0.31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PessimisticOracle

· 8h ago

Another group of analysts is coming out to bearish. How should I put it? Have their predictions been accurate? Honestly, fundamentals are what really matter. Don't be fooled by those data. The 50-week moving average? Just listen to it, don't treat it as gospel. Industrial demand can't support a 73% premium; that logic simply doesn't hold up. Macro policies are the real key. What's the institutions doing that’s worth paying attention to? It's the old routine—an anxiety-inducing machine is back in operation.

View OriginalReply0

QuietlyStaking

· 8h ago

It's the same 50-week moving average trick again, I'm already tired of hearing it. People still boast about things that don't add up—who would believe that? Macro policies are alive; charts are dead. There's nothing wrong with that statement. The 73% surge in silver seemed outrageous to me; the recession theme has been hot for half a year and still isn't over. Bitcoin 2026? Instead of calculating moving averages, it's better to keep a close eye on the Federal Reserve's moves—that's where the decision power lies. Anxiety traders profit from this kind of panic spread; don't get hijacked.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTherapist

· 8h ago

Here we go again, another prediction of a 55% crash, hearing it so often that my ears are almost calloused. Analysts keep talking about moving averages, but I just wonder, can this thing really determine the rise and fall? Wake up, brother. Silver at a 73% premium? Uh, the numbers don’t add up. Looks like this wave is about to end. How Bitcoin will move in 2026 depends on policies and capital; those few lines on the chart are not worth fussing over. Private message bombardment of anxiety—honestly, this is a common problem among retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinHunter

· 8h ago

It's the same old 50-week moving average again, really time to detox from the brainwashing Analysts' predictions? I think their forecasts are never accurate haha The 73% premium on silver has long seemed ridiculous; if the numbers don't match, it's about to collapse Macro policies and institutional movements are the real underlying logic, I quite agree with this statement Who dares to confirm Bitcoin in 2026? Everyone's just guessing But speaking of which, anxiety aside, if you want to go all-in, then go all-in This wave is truly different... source: trust me bro Instead of looking at moving averages, it's better to look at macro factors, at least the logic is more consistent Personally, I think a breakdown isn't scary; what's scary is the lack of support levels The most vulnerable time to be fooled is during the bottoming phase, be cautious It sounds like the author is advising others to be rational, but I still can't hold back and want to go all-in

View OriginalReply0

ZkProofPudding

· 8h ago

Once again, some organization predicts a big drop, and I'm already deaf from hearing it. To be honest, the data doesn't add up at all; a 73% premium can't be sustained. Macro policies are the real deal; those charts are just superficial.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisfit

· 8h ago

It's the same old rhetoric, I'm tired of hearing it. The key still depends on macro policy trends; those charts are really just psychological comfort.

View OriginalReply0