2026-01-03 10:25:45

The Flow blockchain network has resumed normal operation, and both the Cadence and EVM technical lines have been launched simultaneously. According to the latest official updates, the ecosystem recovery work is still ongoing, and full recovery is expected within this week. The official promises to publish a detailed technical post-mortem analysis within 48 hours, which is crucial for developers and the community to understand the cause of this incident. It seems that the Flow team has acted quickly in handling this event, and their transparency is also acceptable.

FLOW-2,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainChef

· 01-06 03:18

flow's back in the kitchen and actually serving something edible this time, ngl. dual-track deployment? that's some proper recipe coordination right there.

Reply0

MEVHunterBearish

· 01-03 10:55

It seems that Flow is quite professional this time. Releasing the report within 48 hours shows they are taking it seriously, but the real test is whether there will be actual improvements afterward.

View OriginalReply0

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 01-03 10:54

The response time this time is pretty good; releasing the report within 48 hours shows some sincerity. I'm just worried that it might be filled with a bunch of technical jargon to stall, and whether they can clearly explain the true root cause is the real test.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 01-03 10:45

Hmm, Flow's move this time is quite swift. The promise to release the analysis report within 48 hours depends on whether it can be fulfilled.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSurvivor

· 01-03 10:28

Hmm, not bad. At least it didn't flop. I'm just worried that later analysis will be the same old routine and just a perfunctory response.

View OriginalReply0