The core of controlling losses is not about how to stop them, but about thinking beforehand: under what circumstances must I exit.



If your only standard is "break even at the original price," then at the very moment you place the order, the seed of chaos is planted.

Losses on open positions are actually common. The market won't move in your favor just because you entered. You must allow the price to move against you for a while, and every trade should be prepared for the possibility of losing your principal. If you want to cut losses at the first sign of floating loss, that's not trading at all—you're just testing your psychological bottom line with each order.

Many people think, "I'll wait until there's a floating profit, and if it falls back to cost, I'll close it, never letting myself lose." Sounds prudent, but in reality, it's fundamentally contradictory.

Trends never move in a straight line. Even with the correct direction, deep retracements are inevitable. Without clear standards, you can only swing between two extremes: either stubbornly hold on and can't bear it, or frequently enter and exit, ultimately destroying your account and your mindset.

Here's a counterintuitive but crucial phenomenon—

The larger the acceptable drawdown space, the lower the frequency of stop-losses, and the stronger the ability to catch trends. Conversely, the more "refined" your stop-loss is set, the easier it is to fall into the trap of infinite stop-losses—before the trend is complete, you’ve already been shaken out.

Another mindset that must be reversed: the stop-loss point is not a psychological number. Concepts like "must not lose" or "break even" don't count. Truly effective stop-losses are dynamically adjusted based on position structure and profit/loss status, depending on whether the trade has failed structurally, not on whether you can subjectively accept it.

Finally, the most painful part of trend trading—price always moves forward amid fluctuations.

In the early stage of a trend, floating profits of 10% to 30% may disappear or even turn into losses. In the middle of a trend, you might watch as 80% or nearly double profits retrace by half. At this point, fear will push you to break even at the original price or lock in small profits quickly. But the big trend is precisely born in this uncomfortable phase.

Most trend trades are opened near support or resistance, which inherently means most of the initial time involves volatile losses. If you can't master proper stop-loss techniques, in the long run, so-called trend traders may get the direction right, but they will definitely not be able to keep the money.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoDouble-O-Sevenvip
· 01-06 10:19
Well said, this is something I only realized after repeatedly taking losses. Setting no stop-loss points is equivalent to having no plan; in the end, it's still gambling. Cutting 80% of the retracement and then watching it double—such a feeling is truly amazing. The key is to think about exit conditions before entering the position, not just look at market sentiment. This is my current problem: when there's a floating loss, I want to run, but as a result, I miss several trend waves. Thinking about this logic in reverse is also correct; a refined stop-loss can actually lead to quicker death. It took me over half a year to slowly understand this point. Stop-loss is not about psychological endurance; it's about whether the structure is broken. Reading this article was a bit heart-wrenching; I got caught in the crossfire again.
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteranvip
· 01-06 06:55
That really hits home. I once lost everything over the idea of "breaking even at the original price"... --- So, you need to think about an exit strategy before entering, or you're just gambling. --- The biggest lesson from ten years of being a rookie is—cut losses when you're floating in the red. You're basically working for the market makers. --- I totally agree with allowing large drawdowns; otherwise, you'll be washed out a thousand times over. --- Don’t talk to me about psychological bottom lines. Trading is about whether the structure is broken; feelings should be put aside. --- Watching profits double and then retrace half makes me want to sell, but the trades I held onto without selling actually ended up making money... That’s the market’s cunning. --- After so many years, I finally understand that stop-loss points are not just numbers—they are rules. --- Many people can't bear to lose a few points and go all-in at break-even, only to have their accounts wiped out in the end. I’ve been there. I advise everyone not to play that way.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 01-05 21:21
Well said, stop-loss points should be based on structure, not psychology. That's the key. I used to be the kind of loser who would cut losses at the first sign of a dip, and as a result, I was washed out countless times.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaservip
· 01-03 12:51
Setting the stop-loss point too rigidly is really suicidal; I've been washed out like that before... Now I understand, you need to let the bullets fly for a while. It's a real wake-up call; many people die because of the obsession with "breaking even," repeatedly stopping losses and eating into all the profits. The real difficulty lies in mindset. Knowing the truth is one thing, but when you're truly losing money, you still want to cut, or you just hold on stubbornly... that's the hardest part. The feeling of a 50% retracement of an 80% profit can really drive people crazy, but the market tends to come when things are most uncomfortable. My lessons are blood-stained... The stop-loss should be based on structure, not on psychological endurance. Remember this.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnarkvip
· 01-03 12:47
That hit too close to home. I previously lost everything because of this... frequent stop-losses, stop-losses, and more stop-losses. In the end, I realized the direction was correct, but the money was gone. That's why stop-losses can't rely on feelings; you need a clear structural standard. Otherwise, you'll really get wiped out. Allowing a larger retracement space but having fewer stop-losses? This is indeed counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you think about it. Otherwise, how could you possibly catch the trend's gains? I'm now trying to change this mindset, no longer fixating on the cost basis, but instead focusing on whether the trading structure is broken.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 01-03 12:46
That really hits home. I used to be the kind of fool who would cut losses at the first sign of floating loss, and as a result, I kept hitting stop-losses and paying fees. Now I understand that true stop-loss isn't about a psychological price level; it's about whether the structure has been broken.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeekvip
· 01-03 12:43
This... really hits me hard. I'm the kind of fool who just sells off at the first sign of a dip.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancakevip
· 01-03 12:43
Damn, this is the reason I've been losing all along. My stop-loss points are set as delicately as my girlfriend's mood, and I've been wiped out countless times.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddictvip
· 01-03 12:40
This is the tuition fee I've been paying all along, it hits too close to home.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRidervip
· 01-03 12:37
It's so heartbreaking, so many people die on the words "original price flat," and as a result, they frequently cut losses and end up bankrupt. --- Really, the tighter the stop-loss is set, the easier it is to be washed out, which actually feeds the market. --- This statement hit me hard. Even with the right direction, I can't hold onto my money. That's just who I am. --- Allowing larger retracements to capture stronger trends may seem counterintuitive, but it's spot on. I need to engrain this in my mind. --- Seeing a 30% unrealized profit disappear is really painful, but it's true—big market moves happen in discomfort. --- Opening near support or resistance is destined to incur initial losses. You must accept this from the start, or you'll be played to death by your mindset sooner or later. --- The question is, who can really "think about exiting before entering"? Easy to say. --- Stop-loss is not a psychological number; it's about whether the structure has failed. This cognitive shift is so important. --- People who trade frequently are just treating trading as a psychological test. No wonder their accounts and mindset both collapse.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)